JDVL vs MFSV
John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF vs MFS Active Value ETF
Which is better, JDVL or MFSV?
JDVL has been ahead.
MFSV has a lower expense ratio. JDVL led over 1Y and the full window. MFSV is less concentrated, with 32.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JDVL | MFSV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.44%Best |
| AUM | $948M | $618M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.48% | 1.41% |
| Holdings | 41 | 64 |
| YTD Return | +15.90%Best | +9.21% |
| 1Y Return | +21.37%Best | +12.64% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.2% | 10.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.2% | -6.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $12,918Best | $11,743 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.0% | 32.9%Best |
| Fund Family | John Hancock Investment Management | MFS Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 6, 2025 | Dec 5, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 6, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.2 years).
JDVL vs MFSV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
JDVL vs MFSV Performance
John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF (JDVL) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management and MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management. Over the past year JDVL returned +21.37% while MFSV returned +12.64%. Year to date, JDVL is up 15.90% versus a gain of 9.21% for MFSV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JDVL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.2% compared with 10.1% for MFSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.2% for JDVL and -6.3% for MFSV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JDVL charges 0.56% per year while MFSV charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $44 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JDVL currently yields 1.48% against 1.41% for MFSV.
Holdings Overlap
33.9% of JDVL's money is in holdings MFSV also owns. 24.7% of MFSV's money is in holdings JDVL also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in JDVL and 60 in MFSV, against full books of 41 and 64.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 50 positions for MFSV that do not appear in our book for JDVL (72.8% of the fund), and 27 for JDVL that do not appear in MFSV (59.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JDVL | Weight in MFSV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.48% | 5.28% | 2.20% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.77% | 5.35% | 0.42% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.03% | 4.50% | 0.47% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 2.65% | 2.15% | 0.50% |
| NXPINxp Semiconductors Nv Sedol B505Pn7 | 3.25% | 1.31% | 1.94% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 3.17% | 1.04% | 2.13% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 1.90% | 1.95% | 0.05% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.19% | 1.48% | 0.71% |
| HONHoneywell International Inc | 1.81% | 0.85% | 0.96% |
| CRH:LNCrh Plc - Common | 1.64% | 0.78% | 0.86% |
33.9% of JDVL is already inside MFSV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JDVL or MFSV?
JDVL has an expense ratio of 0.56% while MFSV charges 0.44%. MFSV is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, JDVL or MFSV?
Over the past year JDVL returned +21.37% vs +12.64% for MFSV, so JDVL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), JDVL annualized +23.78% vs +14.33% for MFSV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JDVL or MFSV?
JDVL has been the more volatile fund at 12.2% annualized versus 10.1% for MFSV. Worst drawdown: JDVL -9.2% vs MFSV -6.3%.
Should I hold both JDVL and MFSV?
JDVL and MFSV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between JDVL and MFSV?
33.9% of JDVL's money is in holdings MFSV also owns. 24.7% of MFSV's is in holdings JDVL also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in JDVL and 60 in MFSV.
Which pays a higher dividend, JDVL or MFSV?
JDVL yields 1.48% while MFSV yields 1.41%, so JDVL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MFSV better than JDVL?
MFSV has a lower expense ratio. JDVL led over 1Y and the full window. MFSV is less concentrated, with 32.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.