JDVL vs QUVU
John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF vs Hartford Quality Value ETF
Which is better, JDVL or QUVU?
JDVL has been ahead.
QUVU has a lower expense ratio. JDVL led over 1Y. QUVU is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JDVL | QUVU |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.45%Best |
| AUM | $948M | $174M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.48% | 1.87% |
| Holdings | 41 | 72 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.0% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | John Hancock Investment Management | Hartford Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 6, 2025 | Oct 13, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 168 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. JDVL has data through Oct 14, 2026 and QUVU through Apr 29, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JDVL charges 0.56% per year while QUVU charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $45 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JDVL currently yields 1.48% against 1.87% for QUVU.
Holdings Overlap
46.0% of JDVL's money is in holdings QUVU also owns. 19.5% of QUVU's money is in holdings JDVL also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 275 days apart, JDVL as of Oct 2, 2026 and QUVU as of Dec 31, 2025, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
15 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in JDVL and 70 in QUVU, against full books of 41 and 72.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 50 positions for QUVU that do not appear in our book for JDVL (73.4% of the fund), and 21 for JDVL that do not appear in QUVU (45.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JDVL | Weight in QUVU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.48% | 1.25% | 6.23% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.77% | 1.16% | 4.61% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 3.17% | 2.05% | 1.12% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.03% | 1.16% | 2.87% |
| NXPINxp Semiconductors Nv Sedol B505Pn7 | 3.25% | 1.82% | 1.43% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.78% | 1.64% | 1.14% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 2.77% | 1.63% | 1.14% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 2.65% | 1.69% | 0.96% |
| HUBBHubbell Inc | 2.25% | 2.05% | 0.20% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.51% | 0.81% | 1.70% |
46.0% of JDVL is already inside QUVU.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JDVL or QUVU?
JDVL has an expense ratio of 0.56% while QUVU charges 0.45%. QUVU is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between JDVL and QUVU?
46.0% of JDVL's money is in holdings QUVU also owns. 19.5% of QUVU's is in holdings JDVL also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in JDVL and 70 in QUVU.
Which pays a higher dividend, JDVL or QUVU?
JDVL yields 1.48% while QUVU yields 1.87%, so QUVU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QUVU better than JDVL?
QUVU has a lower expense ratio. JDVL led over 1Y. QUVU is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.