JDVL vs REVS
John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
Which is better, JDVL or REVS?
REVS has been ahead.
REVS has a lower expense ratio. REVS led over 1Y and the full window. REVS is less concentrated, with 33.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JDVL | REVS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.19%Best |
| AUM | $948M | $370M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.48% | 1.84% |
| Holdings | 41 | 611 |
| YTD Return | +15.90% | +18.22%Best |
| 1Y Return | +21.37% | +23.33%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.45% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.2% | 10.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.2% | -6.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $12,918 | $12,934Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.0% | 33.6%Best |
| Fund Family | John Hancock Investment Management | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 6, 2025 | Sep 25, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 6, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.2 years).
JDVL vs REVS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
JDVL vs REVS Performance
John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF (JDVL) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management and Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Over the past year JDVL returned +21.37% while REVS returned +23.33%. Year to date, JDVL is up 15.90% versus a gain of 18.22% for REVS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JDVL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.2% compared with 10.5% for REVS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.2% for JDVL and -6.9% for REVS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JDVL charges 0.56% per year while REVS charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $19 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JDVL currently yields 1.48% against 1.84% for REVS.
Holdings Overlap
22.2% of JDVL's money is in holdings REVS also owns. 12.9% of REVS's money is in holdings JDVL also owns.
JDVL and REVS share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in JDVL and 298 in REVS, against full books of 41 and 611.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 277 positions for REVS that do not appear in our book for JDVL (85.6% of the fund), and 29 for JDVL that do not appear in REVS (70.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JDVL | Weight in REVS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.77% | 7.16% | 1.39% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.89% | 2.05% | 1.84% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.19% | 1.11% | 1.08% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 2.77% | 0.49% | 2.28% |
| IQVI Q V I A Holdings Inc. | 2.34% | 0.58% | 1.76% |
| FDXFedex Corp | 1.61% | 0.72% | 0.89% |
| CRH:LNCrh Plc - Common | 1.64% | 0.62% | 1.02% |
| FEFirstenergy Corp | 2.00% | 0.17% | 1.83% |
22.2% of JDVL is already inside REVS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JDVL or REVS?
JDVL has an expense ratio of 0.56% while REVS charges 0.19%. REVS is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, JDVL or REVS?
Over the past year JDVL returned +21.37% vs +23.33% for REVS, so REVS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), JDVL annualized +23.78% vs +23.91% for REVS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JDVL or REVS?
JDVL has been the more volatile fund at 12.2% annualized versus 10.5% for REVS. Worst drawdown: JDVL -9.2% vs REVS -6.9%.
Should I hold both JDVL and REVS?
JDVL and REVS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between JDVL and REVS?
22.2% of JDVL's money is in holdings REVS also owns. 12.9% of REVS's is in holdings JDVL also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in JDVL and 298 in REVS.
Which pays a higher dividend, JDVL or REVS?
JDVL yields 1.48% while REVS yields 1.84%, so REVS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is REVS better than JDVL?
REVS has a lower expense ratio. REVS led over 1Y and the full window. REVS is less concentrated, with 33.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.