JDVL vs TALV
John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF vs Transamerica Large Value Active ETF
Which is better, JDVL or TALV?
TALV costs less.
TALV has a lower expense ratio. TALV is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JDVL | TALV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $948M | $178M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.48% | 0.73% |
| Holdings | 41 | 70 |
| YTD Return | +15.90%Best | +14.25% |
| 1Y Return | +21.37% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.0% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | John Hancock Investment Management | Transamerica |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 6, 2025 | Dec 15, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
JDVL vs TALV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
JDVL vs TALV Performance
John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF (JDVL) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management and Transamerica Large Value Active ETF (TALV) is an ETF from Transamerica. Year to date, JDVL is up 15.90% versus a gain of 14.25% for TALV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JDVL charges 0.56% per year while TALV charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $49 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JDVL currently yields 1.48% against 0.73% for TALV.
Holdings Overlap
39.4% of JDVL's money is in holdings TALV also owns. 28.8% of TALV's money is in holdings JDVL also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
13 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in JDVL and 68 in TALV, against full books of 41 and 70.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 39 and 68 positions we hold weights for.
JDVL holds 23 positions TALV does not, 52.1% of the fund.
Largest: USFD 3.78%, NXPI 3.25%, PM 3.17%, NVDA 3.13%, V 2.78%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JDVL | Weight in TALV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.48% | 5.51% | 1.97% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.77% | 5.28% | 0.49% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.03% | 4.00% | 0.03% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.89% | 1.59% | 2.30% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.19% | 2.35% | 0.16% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 2.77% | 1.67% | 1.10% |
| DISWalt Disney Co | 2.02% | 1.57% | 0.45% |
| CORCencora Inc | 2.35% | 1.02% | 1.33% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.51% | 0.84% | 1.67% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 1.90% | 1.41% | 0.49% |
39.4% of JDVL is already inside TALV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JDVL or TALV?
JDVL has an expense ratio of 0.56% while TALV charges 0.49%. TALV is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between JDVL and TALV?
39.4% of JDVL's money is in holdings TALV also owns. 28.8% of TALV's is in holdings JDVL also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in JDVL and 68 in TALV.
Which pays a higher dividend, JDVL or TALV?
JDVL yields 1.48% while TALV yields 0.73%, so JDVL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TALV better than JDVL?
TALV has a lower expense ratio. TALV is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.