JGLO vs RGLO
JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF vs Russell Investments Global Equity ETF
Which is better, JGLO or RGLO?
Nearly the same fund. JGLO costs less.
JGLO has a lower expense ratio. RGLO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. RGLO is less concentrated, with 26.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JGLO | RGLO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $6.4B | $368M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.12% | 0.57% |
| Holdings | 186 | 384 |
| YTD Return | +6.16% | +11.84%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.59% | +18.24%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.41% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.3%Best | 10.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.5%Best | -9.6% |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $11,931 | $13,219Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.4% | 26.2%Best |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Russell Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 13, 2023 | May 29, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 30, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.4 years).
JGLO vs RGLO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
JGLO vs RGLO Performance
JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF (JGLO) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) is an ETF from Russell Investments. Over the past year JGLO returned +8.59% while RGLO returned +18.24%. Year to date, JGLO is up 6.16% versus a gain of 11.84% for RGLO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RGLO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.0% compared with 9.3% for JGLO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.5% for JGLO and -9.6% for RGLO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JGLO charges 0.47% per year while RGLO charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $49 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JGLO currently yields 1.12% against 0.57% for RGLO.
Holdings Overlap
60.5% of JGLO's money is in holdings RGLO also owns. 31.6% of RGLO's money is in holdings JGLO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
39 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in JGLO and 346 in RGLO, against full books of 186 and 384.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 80 positions for RGLO that do not appear in our book for JGLO (23.9% of the fund), and 21 for JGLO that do not appear in RGLO (23.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JGLO | Weight in RGLO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.10% | 4.99% | 3.11% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.48% | 3.30% | 3.18% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.89% | 4.51% | 0.62% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 4.29% | 1.38% | 2.91% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.38% | 1.96% | 0.42% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 3.25% | 0.85% | 2.40% |
| ASML:ASASML HOLDING NV | 2.86% | 0.60% | 2.26% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.60% | 0.64% | 1.96% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.14% | 1.75% | 0.61% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 0.69% | 1.44% | 0.75% |
60.5% of JGLO is already inside RGLO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JGLO or RGLO?
JGLO has an expense ratio of 0.47% while RGLO charges 0.49%. JGLO is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, JGLO or RGLO?
Over the past year JGLO returned +8.59% vs +18.24% for RGLO, so RGLO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), JGLO annualized +13.44% vs +22.06% for RGLO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JGLO or RGLO?
RGLO has been the more volatile fund at 10.0% annualized versus 9.3% for JGLO. Worst drawdown: JGLO -9.5% vs RGLO -9.6%.
Should I hold both JGLO and RGLO?
JGLO and RGLO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between JGLO and RGLO?
60.5% of JGLO's money is in holdings RGLO also owns. 31.6% of RGLO's is in holdings JGLO also owns. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in JGLO and 346 in RGLO.
Which pays a higher dividend, JGLO or RGLO?
JGLO yields 1.12% while RGLO yields 0.57%, so JGLO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RGLO better than JGLO?
JGLO has a lower expense ratio. RGLO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. RGLO is less concentrated, with 26.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.