JGLO vs THOR
JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF vs Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF
Which is better, JGLO or THOR?
JGLO costs less.
JGLO has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JGLO | THOR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $6.4B | $38M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.12% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 186 | 59 |
| YTD Return | +6.16%Best | +0.77% |
| 1Y Return | +8.59% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.41% | - |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Thornburg Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 13, 2023 | Jun 22, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
JGLO vs THOR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
JGLO vs THOR Performance
JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF (JGLO) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF (THOR) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management. Year to date, JGLO is up 6.16% versus a gain of 0.77% for THOR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JGLO charges 0.47% per year while THOR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $79 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JGLO currently yields 1.12% against 0.43% for THOR.
Holdings Overlap
At least 5.5% of JGLO's money is in holdings THOR also owns.
Stated as a floor: for THOR, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
JGLO and THOR share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in JGLO and 54 in THOR, against full books of 186 and 59.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of JGLO and THOR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JGLO or THOR?
JGLO has an expense ratio of 0.47% while THOR charges 0.79%. JGLO is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between JGLO and THOR?
At least 5.5% of JGLO's money is in holdings THOR also owns. Our book for THOR is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in JGLO and 54 in THOR.
Which pays a higher dividend, JGLO or THOR?
JGLO yields 1.12% while THOR yields 0.43%, so JGLO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is THOR better than JGLO?
JGLO has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.