JGLO vs URTH
JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF vs iShares MSCI World ETF
Which is better, JGLO or URTH?
Nearly the same fund. URTH costs less.
URTH has a lower expense ratio. URTH led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. URTH is less concentrated, with 27.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JGLO | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.24%Best |
| AUM | $6.4B | $8.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.12% | 1.38% |
| Holdings | 186 | 1,310 |
| YTD Return | +6.16% | +11.87%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.59% | +16.36%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.41% | +20.92%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.34% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.9%Best | 11.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.1%Best | -16.9% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $15,423 | $17,174Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.4% | 27.7%Best |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 13, 2023 | Jan 10, 2012 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 14, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).
JGLO vs URTH growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
JGLO vs URTH Performance
JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF (JGLO) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year JGLO returned +8.59% while URTH returned +16.36%. Year to date, JGLO is up 6.16% versus a gain of 11.87% for URTH.
Over three years, JGLO compounded at +16.41% per year against +20.92% for URTH.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
URTH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.4% compared with 10.9% for JGLO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.1% for JGLO and -16.9% for URTH. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JGLO charges 0.47% per year while URTH charges 0.24%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $24 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JGLO currently yields 1.12% against 1.38% for URTH.
Holdings Overlap
88.6% of JGLO's money is in holdings URTH also owns. 37.3% of URTH's money is in holdings JGLO also owns.
Most of JGLO is already inside URTH. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
65 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in JGLO and 1,220 in URTH, against full books of 186 and 1,310.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 462 positions for URTH that do not appear in our book for JGLO (38.6% of the fund), and 0 for JGLO that do not appear in URTH (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JGLO | Weight in URTH | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.10% | 5.86% | 2.24% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.48% | 3.99% | 2.49% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.89% | 5.36% | 1.47% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.92% | 2.65% | 2.27% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 4.29% | 2.19% | 2.10% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.38% | 1.76% | 0.62% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 3.25% | 0.50% | 2.75% |
| ASML:ASASML HOLDING NV | 2.86% | 0.77% | 2.09% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.60% | 0.69% | 1.91% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.14% | 1.71% | 0.57% |
88.6% of JGLO is already inside URTH.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JGLO or URTH?
JGLO has an expense ratio of 0.47% while URTH charges 0.24%. URTH is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, JGLO or URTH?
Over the past year JGLO returned +8.59% vs +16.36% for URTH, so URTH leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JGLO or URTH?
URTH has been the more volatile fund at 11.4% annualized versus 10.9% for JGLO. Worst drawdown: JGLO -16.1% vs URTH -16.9%.
Should I hold both JGLO and URTH?
JGLO and URTH have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between JGLO and URTH?
88.6% of JGLO's money is in holdings URTH also owns. 37.3% of URTH's is in holdings JGLO also owns. They hold 65 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in JGLO and 1,220 in URTH.
Which pays a higher dividend, JGLO or URTH?
JGLO yields 1.12% while URTH yields 1.38%, so URTH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is URTH better than JGLO?
URTH has a lower expense ratio. URTH led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. URTH is less concentrated, with 27.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.