JHDG vs NUDG
John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF vs Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF
Which is better, JHDG or NUDG?
JHDG costs less.
JHDG has a lower expense ratio. NUDG is less concentrated, with 42.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JHDG | NUDG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 0.61% |
| AUM | $128M | $6.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.18% | 0.50% |
| Holdings | 117 | 43 |
| YTD Return | +10.57%Best | +2.67% |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.8% | 42.3%Best |
| Fund Family | John Hancock Investment Management | Nuveen |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 8, 2026 | Jun 2, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
JHDG vs NUDG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
JHDG vs NUDG Performance
John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF (JHDG) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund ETF (NUDG) is an ETF from Nuveen. Year to date, JHDG is up 10.57% versus a gain of 2.67% for NUDG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JHDG charges 0.49% per year while NUDG charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $61 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JHDG currently yields 0.18% against 0.50% for NUDG.
Holdings Overlap
20.6% of JHDG's money is in holdings NUDG also owns. 28.2% of NUDG's money is in holdings JHDG also owns.
NUDG and JHDG share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 55 positions we hold weights for in JHDG and 42 in NUDG, against full books of 117 and 43.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 33 positions for NUDG that do not appear in our book for JHDG (66.3% of the fund), and 37 for JHDG that do not appear in NUDG (68.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JHDG | Weight in NUDG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.73% | 7.67% | 1.06% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.31% | 5.11% | 0.80% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.32% | 3.72% | 0.60% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 1.40% | 2.45% | 1.05% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | -0.10% | 3.68% | 3.78% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 1.04% | 1.89% | 0.85% |
| TTTt Trane Technologies Plc | 0.82% | 1.93% | 1.11% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | -0.02% | 1.79% | 1.81% |
28.2% of NUDG is already inside JHDG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JHDG or NUDG?
JHDG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while NUDG charges 0.61%. JHDG is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between JHDG and NUDG?
28.2% of NUDG's money is in holdings JHDG also owns. 28.2% of NUDG's is in holdings JHDG also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 55 positions we hold weights for in JHDG and 42 in NUDG.
Which pays a higher dividend, JHDG or NUDG?
JHDG yields 0.18% while NUDG yields 0.50%, so NUDG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NUDG better than JHDG?
JHDG has a lower expense ratio. NUDG is less concentrated, with 42.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.