JHDG vs QLTY
John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF vs GMO US Quality ETF
Which is better, JHDG or QLTY?
JHDG costs less.
JHDG has a lower expense ratio. QLTY is less concentrated, with 45.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JHDG | QLTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $128M | $5.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.18% | 0.66% |
| Holdings | 117 | 90 |
| YTD Return | +10.57% | +14.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.95% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.84% |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.8% | 45.5%Best |
| Fund Family | John Hancock Investment Management | GMO |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 8, 2026 | Nov 13, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
JHDG vs QLTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
JHDG vs QLTY Performance
John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF (JHDG) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management and GMO US Quality ETF (QLTY) is an ETF from GMO. Year to date, JHDG is up 10.57% versus a gain of 14.13% for QLTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JHDG charges 0.49% per year while QLTY charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $50 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JHDG currently yields 0.18% against 0.66% for QLTY.
Holdings Overlap
35.1% of JHDG's money is in holdings QLTY also owns. 27.4% of QLTY's money is in holdings JHDG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
7 positions in common, counted across the 55 positions we hold weights for in JHDG and 45 in QLTY, against full books of 117 and 90.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 38 positions for QLTY that do not appear in our book for JHDG (72.3% of the fund), and 36 for JHDG that do not appear in QLTY (53.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
35.1% of JHDG is already inside QLTY.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JHDG or QLTY?
JHDG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QLTY charges 0.50%. JHDG is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between JHDG and QLTY?
35.1% of JHDG's money is in holdings QLTY also owns. 27.4% of QLTY's is in holdings JHDG also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 55 positions we hold weights for in JHDG and 45 in QLTY.
Which pays a higher dividend, JHDG or QLTY?
JHDG yields 0.18% while QLTY yields 0.66%, so QLTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QLTY better than JHDG?
JHDG has a lower expense ratio. QLTY is less concentrated, with 45.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.