JLCO vs VTI

JLCO vs VTI

Which is better, JLCO or VTI?

VTI costs less.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.1%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJLCOVTI
Expense Ratio0.39%0.03%Best
AUM$11M$689.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings1083,524
YTD Return+2.73%+13.02%Best
1Y Return-+16.63%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.97%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.99%
Top 10 Weight47.1%33.5%Best
Fund FamilyJohn Hancock Investment ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 14, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

JLCO vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

JLCO vs VTI Performance

John Hancock Large Cap Opportunities ETF (JLCO) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, JLCO is up 2.73% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JLCO charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JLCO currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

JLCO already in VTI89.6%
VTI already in JLCO33.1%

89.6% of JLCO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 33.1% of VTI's money is in holdings JLCO also owns.

Most of JLCO is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

45 positions in common, counted across the 55 positions we hold weights for in JLCO and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 108 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,111 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for JLCO (64.4% of the fund), and 3 for JLCO that do not appear in VTI (3.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in JLCOWeight in VTIDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp7.94%5.11%2.83%
NVDANvidia Corp5.22%6.88%1.66%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc6.84%2.70%4.14%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc6.13%3.41%2.72%
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.47%2.38%2.09%
JPMJpmorgan Chase4.05%1.29%2.76%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.97%1.04%2.93%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.2.62%1.33%1.29%
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity2.63%1.23%1.40%
COSTCostco Wholesale Corp.3.22%0.57%2.65%

89.6% of JLCO is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

JLCOVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JLCO or VTI?

JLCO has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between JLCO and VTI?

89.6% of JLCO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 33.1% of VTI's is in holdings JLCO also owns. They hold 45 positions in common, counted across the 55 positions we hold weights for in JLCO and 3,441 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, JLCO or VTI?

JLCO yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than JLCO?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.