JLVP vs TALV
JPMorgan US Large Cap Value Plus ETF vs Transamerica Large Value Active ETF
Which is better, JLVP or TALV?
TALV costs less.
TALV has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JLVP | TALV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.05% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $28M | $178M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.73% |
| Holdings | 154 | 70 |
| YTD Return | +1.10% | +14.25%Best |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Transamerica |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 30, 2026 | Dec 15, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
JLVP vs TALV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
JLVP vs TALV Performance
JPMorgan US Large Cap Value Plus ETF (JLVP) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Transamerica Large Value Active ETF (TALV) is an ETF from Transamerica. Year to date, JLVP is up 1.10% versus a gain of 14.25% for TALV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JLVP charges 1.05% per year while TALV charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $105 vs $49 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JLVP currently yields 0.00% against 0.73% for TALV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 43.2% of TALV's money is in holdings JLVP also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for JLVP, our book for it lists positions totalling 132.0% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
21 positions in common, counted across the 153 positions we hold weights for in JLVP and 68 in TALV, against full books of 154 and 70.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 153 and 68 positions we hold weights for.
JLVP holds 86 positions TALV does not, 83.5% of the fund.
Largest: JIMXX 3.90%, EQR 2.39%, T 2.19%, AZO 2.08%, NOW 2.07%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JLVP | Weight in TALV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 8.99% | 5.51% | 3.48% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.60% | 5.28% | 1.32% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.59% | 5.22% | 2.63% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.27% | 1.59% | 1.68% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 2.71% | 1.88% | 0.83% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 2.70% | 1.63% | 1.07% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.72% | 2.35% | 0.63% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 1.02% | 2.97% | 1.95% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 2.30% | 1.41% | 0.89% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 1.88% | 1.33% | 0.55% |
43.2% of TALV is already inside JLVP.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JLVP or TALV?
JLVP has an expense ratio of 1.05% while TALV charges 0.49%. TALV is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between JLVP and TALV?
At least 43.2% of TALV's money is in holdings JLVP also owns. Our book for JLVP is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 153 positions we hold weights for in JLVP and 68 in TALV.
Which pays a higher dividend, JLVP or TALV?
JLVP yields 0.00% while TALV yields 0.73%, so TALV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TALV better than JLVP?
TALV has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.