JPO vs PMAY
YieldMax JP Option Income Strategy ETF vs Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - May
Which is better, JPO or PMAY?
Each has led over a different period.
PMAY has a lower expense ratio. JPO led over 3Y and the full window, PMAY over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JPO | PMAY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.04% | 0.79%Best |
| AUM | $30M | $820M |
| Dividend Yield | 33.70% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 28 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +2.70% | +7.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.26% | +9.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.61%Best | +12.43% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.24% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.8% | 4.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.8% | -9.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $15,232Best | $14,150 |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Sep 11, 2023 | Apr 30, 2020 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 12, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).
JPO vs PMAY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
JPO vs PMAY Performance
YieldMax JP Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF and Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - May (PMAY) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year JPO returned +8.26% while PMAY returned +9.34%. Year to date, JPO is up 2.70% versus a gain of 7.13% for PMAY.
Over three years, JPO compounded at +14.61% per year against +12.43% for PMAY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JPO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 4.3% for PMAY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.8% for JPO and -9.4% for PMAY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JPO charges 1.04% per year while PMAY charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $104 vs $79 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JPO currently yields 33.70% against 0.00% for PMAY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of JPO and PMAY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JPO or PMAY?
JPO has an expense ratio of 1.04% while PMAY charges 0.79%. PMAY is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, JPO or PMAY?
Over the past year JPO returned +8.26% vs +9.34% for PMAY, so PMAY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JPO or PMAY?
JPO has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 4.3% for PMAY. Worst drawdown: JPO -24.8% vs PMAY -9.4%.
Should I hold both JPO and PMAY?
JPO and PMAY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, JPO or PMAY?
JPO yields 33.70% while PMAY yields 0.00%, so JPO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PMAY better than JPO?
PMAY has a lower expense ratio. JPO led over 3Y and the full window, PMAY over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.