JUDO vs VTI

JUDO vs VTI

Which is better, JUDO or VTI?

VTI costs less.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.7%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJUDOVTI
Expense Ratio0.55%0.03%Best
AUM$8M$689.2B
Dividend Yield2.87%1.06%
Holdings1283,524
YTD Return+12.87%+13.02%Best
1Y Return-+16.63%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.97%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.99%
Top 10 Weight41.7%33.5%Best
Fund FamilyJanus Henderson InvestorsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 24, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

JUDO vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

JUDO vs VTI Performance

Janus Henderson US Equity Enhanced Income ETF (JUDO) is an ETF from Janus Henderson Investors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, JUDO is up 12.87% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JUDO charges 0.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JUDO currently yields 2.87% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

JUDO already in VTI99.3%
VTI already in JUDO47.4%

99.3% of JUDO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 47.4% of VTI's money is in holdings JUDO also owns.

Most of JUDO is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

69 positions in common, counted across the 70 positions we hold weights for in JUDO and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 128 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,087 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for JUDO (50.2% of the fund), and 1 for JUDO that do not appear in VTI (0.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in JUDOWeight in VTIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.20%6.88%1.32%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp6.86%5.11%1.75%
AAPLApple, Inc4.70%6.30%1.60%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C6.29%2.12%4.17%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.27%3.41%0.86%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.13%2.38%0.75%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2.23%1.46%0.77%
JPMJpmorgan Chase2.28%1.29%0.99%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.2.06%1.33%0.73%
METAMeta Platforms Inc0.95%1.70%0.75%

99.3% of JUDO is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

JUDOVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JUDO or VTI?

JUDO has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between JUDO and VTI?

99.3% of JUDO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 47.4% of VTI's is in holdings JUDO also owns. They hold 69 positions in common, counted across the 70 positions we hold weights for in JUDO and 3,441 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, JUDO or VTI?

JUDO yields 2.87% while VTI yields 1.06%, so JUDO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than JUDO?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.