JULJ vs QQQY

JULJ vs QQQY

Which is better, JULJ or QQQY?

QQQY has been ahead.

JULJ has a lower expense ratio. QQQY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: JULJHigher Returns: QQQY

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJULJQQQY
Expense Ratio0.79%Best1.01%
AUM$14M$192M
Dividend Yield4.49%33.38%
Holdings2710
YTD Return-0.22%+17.03%Best
1Y Return-0.40%+20.86%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+4.02%+28.44%Best
Volatility (annualized)2.0%Best15.4%
Max Drawdown-3.6%Best-12.6%
$10,000 over 3.1 years$11,256$21,154Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustDefiance ETFs, LLC
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionJul 3, 2023Sep 13, 2023

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 14, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).

JULJ vs QQQY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare JULJ against instead:JULJ vs SPYJULJ vs QQQJULJ vs VOOJULJ vs VTIQQQY against:QQQY vs VXUS

JULJ vs QQQY Performance

Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July (JULJ) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Weekly Distribution ETF (QQQY) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC. Over the past year JULJ returned -0.40% while QQQY returned +20.86%. Year to date, JULJ is down 0.22% versus a gain of 17.03% for QQQY.

Over three years, JULJ compounded at +4.02% per year against +28.44% for QQQY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 2.0% for JULJ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.6% for JULJ and -12.6% for QQQY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JULJ charges 0.79% per year while QQQY charges 1.01%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $101 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JULJ currently yields 4.49% against 33.38% for QQQY.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of JULJ and QQQY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

JULJQQQY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JULJ or QQQY?

JULJ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while QQQY charges 1.01%. JULJ is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, JULJ or QQQY?

Over the past year JULJ returned -0.40% vs +20.86% for QQQY, so QQQY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, JULJ or QQQY?

QQQY has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 2.0% for JULJ. Worst drawdown: JULJ -3.6% vs QQQY -12.6%.

Should I hold both JULJ and QQQY?

JULJ and QQQY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, JULJ or QQQY?

JULJ yields 4.49% while QQQY yields 33.38%, so QQQY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQY better than JULJ?

JULJ has a lower expense ratio. QQQY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.