JULP vs PMAR

JULP vs PMAR

Which is better, JULP or PMAR?

Each has led over a different period.

JULP has a lower expense ratio. JULP led over the full window, PMAR over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94.

Lower Fees: JULPHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJULPPMAR
Expense Ratio0.50%Best0.79%
AUM$39M$751M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1618
YTD Return+8.57%+9.25%Best
1Y Return+11.67%+12.02%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+13.17%
5Y Return (annualized)-+9.63%
Volatility (annualized)6.7%5.2%Best
Max Drawdown-12.4%-9.3%Best
$10,000 over 2.4 years$13,343Best$13,304
Fund FamilyPGIM InvestmentsInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionMay 8, 2024Mar 2, 2020

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 8, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).

JULP vs PMAR growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.

Compare JULP against instead:JULP vs SPYJULP vs QQQJULP vs VOOJULP vs VTIPMAR against:PMAR vs VXUS

JULP vs PMAR Performance

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - July (JULP) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - March (PMAR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year JULP returned +11.67% while PMAR returned +12.02%. Year to date, JULP is up 8.57% versus a gain of 9.25% for PMAR.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

JULP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.7% compared with 5.2% for PMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.4% for JULP and -9.3% for PMAR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JULP charges 0.50% per year while PMAR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $79 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JULP currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PMAR.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of JULP and PMAR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

JULPPMAR

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JULP or PMAR?

JULP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while PMAR charges 0.79%. JULP is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, JULP or PMAR?

Over the past year JULP returned +11.67% vs +12.02% for PMAR, so PMAR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), JULP annualized +12.77% vs +12.63% for PMAR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, JULP or PMAR?

JULP has been the more volatile fund at 6.7% annualized versus 5.2% for PMAR. Worst drawdown: JULP -12.4% vs PMAR -9.3%.

Should I hold both JULP and PMAR?

JULP and PMAR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, JULP or PMAR?

JULP yields 0.00% while PMAR yields 0.00%, so PMAR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PMAR better than JULP?

JULP has a lower expense ratio. JULP led over the full window, PMAR over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.