JUNM vs KHPI
FT Vest US Equity Max Buffer ETF - June vs Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF
Which is better, JUNM or KHPI?
Each has led over a different period.
JUNM has a lower expense ratio. JUNM led over 1Y, KHPI over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JUNM | KHPI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Best | 0.98% |
| AUM | $68M | $443M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 9.00% |
| Holdings | 8 | 7 |
| YTD Return | +3.65%Best | +0.58% |
| 1Y Return | +4.87%Best | +2.47% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.4%Best | 8.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -5.4%Best | -10.6% |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $11,463 | $11,577Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Kensington Funds |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Jun 21, 2024 | Sep 4, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 5, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.1 years).
JUNM vs KHPI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
JUNM vs KHPI Performance
FT Vest US Equity Max Buffer ETF - June (JUNM) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF (KHPI) is an ETF from Kensington Funds. Over the past year JUNM returned +4.87% while KHPI returned +2.47%. Year to date, JUNM is up 3.65% versus a gain of 0.58% for KHPI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KHPI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 8.5% compared with 3.4% for JUNM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.4% for JUNM and -10.6% for KHPI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JUNM charges 0.85% per year while KHPI charges 0.98%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $98 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JUNM currently yields 0.00% against 9.00% for KHPI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of JUNM and KHPI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JUNM or KHPI?
JUNM has an expense ratio of 0.85% while KHPI charges 0.98%. JUNM is the cheaper option, by $13 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, JUNM or KHPI?
Over the past year JUNM returned +4.87% vs +2.47% for KHPI, so JUNM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), JUNM annualized +6.72% vs +7.22% for KHPI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JUNM or KHPI?
KHPI has been the more volatile fund at 8.5% annualized versus 3.4% for JUNM. Worst drawdown: JUNM -5.4% vs KHPI -10.6%.
Should I hold both JUNM and KHPI?
JUNM and KHPI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, JUNM or KHPI?
JUNM yields 0.00% while KHPI yields 9.00%, so KHPI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is KHPI better than JUNM?
JUNM has a lower expense ratio. JUNM led over 1Y, KHPI over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.