JUNP vs PBJN
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - June vs PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June
Which is better, JUNP or PBJN?
JUNP has been ahead.
JUNP led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JUNP | PBJN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50%Tie | 0.50%Tie |
| AUM | $99M | $59M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 6 | 14 |
| YTD Return | +6.14%Best | +5.35% |
| 1Y Return | +9.00%Best | +7.56% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.8% | 4.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -11.2% | -8.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $13,042Best | $12,644 |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 31, 2024 | May 31, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 3, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
JUNP vs PBJN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
JUNP vs PBJN Performance
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - June (JUNP) is an ETF from PGIM Investments and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - June (PBJN) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year JUNP returned +9.00% while PBJN returned +7.56%. Year to date, JUNP is up 6.14% versus a gain of 5.35% for PBJN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JUNP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.8% compared with 4.7% for PBJN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.2% for JUNP and -8.7% for PBJN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JUNP charges 0.50% per year while PBJN charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $50 annually. On income, JUNP currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PBJN.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of JUNP and PBJN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JUNP or PBJN?
JUNP has an expense ratio of 0.50% while PBJN charges 0.50%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, JUNP or PBJN?
Over the past year JUNP returned +9.00% vs +7.56% for PBJN, so JUNP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), JUNP annualized +11.70% vs +10.27% for PBJN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JUNP or PBJN?
JUNP has been the more volatile fund at 5.8% annualized versus 4.7% for PBJN. Worst drawdown: JUNP -11.2% vs PBJN -8.7%.
Should I hold both JUNP and PBJN?
JUNP and PBJN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, JUNP or PBJN?
JUNP yields 0.00% while PBJN yields 0.00%, so PBJN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PBJN better than JUNP?
JUNP led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.