KALL vs USMC
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF vs Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF
Which is better, KALL or USMC?
Each has led over a different period.
USMC has a lower expense ratio. KALL led over 1Y, USMC over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KALL | USMC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.12%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $5.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.19% | 0.74% |
| Holdings | 210 | 58 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.0% | 16.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -56.3% | -30.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 7.6 years | $10,544 | $25,624Best |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Principal Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 12, 2015 | Oct 11, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 512 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. KALL has data through May 20, 2025 and USMC through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 7.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 12, 2017 to May 20, 2025 (7.6 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KALL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.0% compared with 16.0% for USMC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.3% for KALL and -30.0% for USMC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KALL charges 0.49% per year while USMC charges 0.12%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $12 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KALL currently yields 2.19% against 0.74% for USMC.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KALL and USMC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KALL or USMC?
KALL has an expense ratio of 0.49% while USMC charges 0.12%. USMC is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, KALL or USMC?
KALL has been the more volatile fund at 27.0% annualized versus 16.0% for USMC. Worst drawdown: KALL -56.3% vs USMC -30.0%.
Should I hold both KALL and USMC?
KALL and USMC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, KALL or USMC?
KALL yields 2.19% while USMC yields 0.74%, so KALL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is USMC better than KALL?
USMC has a lower expense ratio. KALL led over 1Y, USMC over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.