KAMO vs VOO
Kensington Credit Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, KAMO or VOO?
VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KAMO | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.92% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $106M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 3.08% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 7 | 506 |
| YTD Return | -4.71% | +13.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.55% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Fund Family | Kensington Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 16, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
KAMO vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
KAMO vs VOO Performance
Kensington Credit Opportunities ETF (KAMO) is an ETF from Kensington Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, KAMO is down 4.71% versus a gain of 13.57% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KAMO charges 0.92% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $92 vs $3 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KAMO currently yields 3.08% against 1.06% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 4 holdings in KAMO and 504 in VOO, totalling 99.4% and 100.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 4 positions we hold weights for in KAMO and 504 in VOO, against full books of 7 and 506.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KAMO and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KAMO or VOO?
KAMO has an expense ratio of 0.92% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $89 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, KAMO or VOO?
KAMO yields 3.08% while VOO yields 1.06%, so KAMO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than KAMO?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.