KDVD vs VTI
Keeley Dividend ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, KDVD or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
KDVD has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KDVD | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00%Best | 0.03% |
| AUM | $8M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.98% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 71 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +11.95% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 8, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
KDVD vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
KDVD vs VTI Performance
Keeley Dividend ETF (KDVD) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, KDVD is up 11.95% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KDVD charges 0.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KDVD currently yields 1.98% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.3% of VTI's money is in holdings KDVD also owns.
Stated as a floor: for KDVD, our book for it covers 91.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VTI and KDVD share little of their money.
62 positions in common, counted across the 67 positions we hold weights for in KDVD and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 71 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KDVD | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONConcentra Group Holdings Parent Inc | 2.49% | 0.01% | 2.48% |
| VCTRVictory Receivables Corp | 2.35% | 0.01% | 2.34% |
| RALRalliant Corp | 2.27% | 0.01% | 2.26% |
| MLABMesa Labs Inc | 2.27% | 0.00% | 2.27% |
| WTTRSelect Energy Services Inc | 2.23% | 0.00% | 2.23% |
| VIRTVirtu Financial Inc Class A | 2.17% | 0.01% | 2.16% |
| QQnity Electronics Inc | 2.06% | 0.03% | 2.03% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.50% | 0.49% | 1.01% |
| VOYAVoya Financial Inc | 1.87% | 0.01% | 1.86% |
| EQHEquitable Holdings Inc. | 1.84% | 0.02% | 1.82% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KDVD and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KDVD or VTI?
KDVD has an expense ratio of 0.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. KDVD is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between KDVD and VTI?
At least 1.3% of VTI's money is in holdings KDVD also owns. Our book for KDVD is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 62 positions in common, counted across the 67 positions we hold weights for in KDVD and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, KDVD or VTI?
KDVD yields 1.98% while VTI yields 1.06%, so KDVD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than KDVD?
KDVD has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.