KEMQ vs VTI
KraneShares Public-Private Emerging Markets Internet and Technology ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, KEMQ or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. KEMQ led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KEMQ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $23M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.18% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 67 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -5.78% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.03% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.47%Best | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.52% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.3% | 16.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -70.7% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,263 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.6% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 11, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 12, 2017 to Oct 14, 2026 (9 years).
KEMQ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9 years both funds cover.
KEMQ vs VTI Performance
KraneShares Public-Private Emerging Markets Internet and Technology ETF (KEMQ) is an ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KEMQ returned -1.03% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, KEMQ is down 5.78% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, KEMQ compounded at +22.47% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -1.52% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.42% annualized vs +0.75%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KEMQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.3% compared with 16.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.7% for KEMQ and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KEMQ charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KEMQ currently yields 5.18% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
1.6% of KEMQ's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
KEMQ and VTI share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in KEMQ and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 67 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,154 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for KEMQ (97.6% of the fund), and 4 for KEMQ that do not appear in VTI (9.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KEMQ and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KEMQ or VTI?
KEMQ has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KEMQ or VTI?
Over the past year KEMQ returned -1.03% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), KEMQ annualized +0.75% vs +13.42% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KEMQ or VTI?
KEMQ has been the more volatile fund at 24.3% annualized versus 16.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KEMQ -70.7% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both KEMQ and VTI?
KEMQ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KEMQ and VTI?
1.6% of KEMQ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.0% of VTI's is in holdings KEMQ also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in KEMQ and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, KEMQ or VTI?
KEMQ yields 5.18% while VTI yields 1.06%, so KEMQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than KEMQ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. KEMQ led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.