KIQQ vs VTI
KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, KIQQ or VTI?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KIQQ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.12% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 104 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +5.83% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 6, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
KIQQ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
KIQQ vs VTI Performance
KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF (KIQQ) is an ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, KIQQ is up 5.83% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KIQQ charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KIQQ currently yields 7.12% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 48.0% of VTI's money is in holdings KIQQ also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for KIQQ, our book for it lists positions totalling 108.7% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
90 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in KIQQ and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 104 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KIQQ | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.95% | 6.88% | 2.07% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.92% | 6.30% | 1.62% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.38% | 5.11% | 1.27% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.54% | 3.41% | 1.13% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 5.53% | 1.46% | 4.07% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.32% | 2.70% | 0.62% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.81% | 1.04% | 3.77% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.58% | 1.70% | 1.88% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.88% | 2.38% | 0.50% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 3.10% | 2.12% | 0.98% |
48.0% of VTI is already inside KIQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KIQQ or VTI?
KIQQ has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between KIQQ and VTI?
At least 48.0% of VTI's money is in holdings KIQQ also owns. Our book for KIQQ is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 90 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in KIQQ and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, KIQQ or VTI?
KIQQ yields 7.12% while VTI yields 1.06%, so KIQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than KIQQ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.