KJD vs QQQ
KraneShares 2x Long JD Daily ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, KJD or QQQ?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KJD | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.25% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 4 | 321 |
| YTD Return | -26.41% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | -43.81% | +22.47%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 87.4% | 21.9%Best |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
KJD vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
KJD vs QQQ Performance
KraneShares 2x Long JD Daily ETF (KJD) is an ETF from KraneShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year KJD returned -43.81% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, KJD is down 26.41% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KJD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 87.4% compared with 21.9% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.31. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KJD charges 1.25% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $125 vs $18 annually, a gap of $107 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KJD currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in KJD and 101 in QQQ, totalling 200.0% and 99.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in KJD and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 4 and 321.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KJD and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KJD or QQQ?
KJD has an expense ratio of 1.25% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $107 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KJD or QQQ?
Over the past year KJD returned -43.81% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KJD or QQQ?
KJD has been the more volatile fund at 87.4% annualized versus 21.9% for QQQ.
Should I hold both KJD and QQQ?
KJD and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.31, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, KJD or QQQ?
KJD yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than KJD?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.