KJUN vs KNOV
Innovator US Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June vs Innovator US Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November
Which is better, KJUN or KNOV?
KNOV has been ahead.
KNOV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KJUN | KNOV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Tie | 0.79%Tie |
| AUM | $56M | $42M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 18 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +1.81% | +7.72%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.93% | +9.30%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.0%Best | 9.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.4%Best | -15.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $10,732 | $12,201Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jun 3, 2024 | Nov 1, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 1, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
KJUN vs KNOV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
KJUN vs KNOV Performance
Innovator US Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - June (KJUN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator US Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November (KNOV) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year KJUN returned +3.93% while KNOV returned +9.30%. Year to date, KJUN is up 1.81% versus a gain of 7.72% for KNOV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KNOV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.0% compared with 7.0% for KJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.4% for KJUN and -15.0% for KNOV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KJUN charges 0.79% per year while KNOV charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, KJUN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for KNOV.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KJUN and KNOV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KJUN or KNOV?
KJUN has an expense ratio of 0.79% while KNOV charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, KJUN or KNOV?
Over the past year KJUN returned +3.93% vs +9.30% for KNOV, so KNOV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), KJUN annualized +3.79% vs +11.04% for KNOV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KJUN or KNOV?
KNOV has been the more volatile fund at 9.0% annualized versus 7.0% for KJUN. Worst drawdown: KJUN -14.4% vs KNOV -15.0%.
Should I hold both KJUN and KNOV?
KJUN and KNOV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, KJUN or KNOV?
KJUN yields 0.00% while KNOV yields 0.00%, so KNOV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is KNOV better than KJUN?
KNOV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.