KMID vs VTI

KMID vs VTI

Which is better, KMID or VTI?

Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricKMIDVTI
Expense Ratio0.80%0.03%Best
AUM$52M$689.2B
Dividend Yield0.12%1.06%
Holdings533,524
YTD Return-3.92%+13.02%Best
1Y Return-3.76%+16.63%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.97%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.99%
Volatility (annualized)12.8%Best12.9%
Max Drawdown-18.9%Best-19.3%
$10,000 over 2 years$9,407$13,424Best
Fund FamilyVirtus Investment PartnersVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 15, 2024May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 16, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).

KMID vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.

KMID vs VTI Performance

Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID) is an ETF from Virtus Investment Partners and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KMID returned -3.76% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, KMID is down 3.92% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 12.8% for KMID. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.9% for KMID and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

KMID charges 0.80% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KMID currently yields 0.12% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

VTI already in KMID0.8%

At least 0.8% of VTI's money is in holdings KMID also owns.

Stated as a floor: for KMID, our book for it covers 94.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.

24 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in KMID and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 53 and 3,524.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in KMIDWeight in VTIDifference
AMEAmetek Inc6.84%0.07%6.77%
MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc5.93%0.08%5.85%
TDYTeledyne Technologies Inc5.73%0.04%5.69%
WABWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.5.63%0.07%5.56%
WSTWest Pharmaceutical Services Inc5.54%0.03%5.51%
ROSTRoss Stores, Inc.4.90%0.10%4.80%
ALLEAllegion Plc4.24%0.02%4.22%
VRSKVerisk Analytics, Inc, Class A3.80%0.03%3.77%
WSOWatsco Inc3.52%0.01%3.51%
ODFLOld Dominion Freig3.45%0.05%3.40%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of KMID and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

KMIDVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, KMID or VTI?

KMID has an expense ratio of 0.80% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, KMID or VTI?

Over the past year KMID returned -3.76% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), KMID annualized -3.01% vs +15.86% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, KMID or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 12.8% for KMID. Worst drawdown: KMID -18.9% vs VTI -19.3%.

Should I hold both KMID and VTI?

KMID and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, KMID or VTI?

KMID yields 0.12% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than KMID?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.