KNCT vs VTI
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, KNCT or VTI?
KNCT has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. KNCT led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KNCT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $162M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.65% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 226 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +47.72%Best | +14.35% |
| 1Y Return | +56.09%Best | +17.97% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +38.25%Best | +22.47% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +17.76%Best | +12.62% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.2% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -57.2% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $22,646Best | $18,117 |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 23, 2005 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 23, 2005 to Oct 13, 2026 (21.3 years).
KNCT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 21.3 years both funds cover.
KNCT vs VTI Performance
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KNCT returned +56.09% while VTI returned +17.97%. Year to date, KNCT is up 47.72% versus a gain of 14.35% for VTI.
Over three years, KNCT compounded at +38.25% per year against +22.47% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +17.76% and +12.62% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, KNCT has the edge at +13.23% annualized vs +9.56%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KNCT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.2% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.2% for KNCT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KNCT charges 0.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KNCT currently yields 0.65% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
68.0% of KNCT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 16.0% of VTI's money is in holdings KNCT also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, KNCT as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
57 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in KNCT and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 226 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,094 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for KNCT (81.5% of the fund), and 7 for KNCT that do not appear in VTI (8.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KNCT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 8.93% | 6.29% | 2.64% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 7.46% | 2.56% | 4.90% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 7.78% | 1.29% | 6.49% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 4.11% | 0.57% | 3.54% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 3.93% | 0.50% | 3.43% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 2.78% | 0.38% | 2.40% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc. | 2.34% | 0.27% | 2.07% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 2.18% | 0.26% | 1.92% |
| VZVerizon Communications Inc Vz | 2.19% | 0.24% | 1.95% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd. | 2.14% | 0.23% | 1.91% |
68.0% of KNCT is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KNCT or VTI?
KNCT has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KNCT or VTI?
Over the past year KNCT returned +56.09% vs +17.97% for VTI, so KNCT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), KNCT annualized +13.23% vs +9.56% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KNCT or VTI?
KNCT has been the more volatile fund at 22.2% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KNCT -57.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KNCT and VTI?
KNCT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KNCT and VTI?
68.0% of KNCT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 16.0% of VTI's is in holdings KNCT also owns. They hold 57 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in KNCT and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, KNCT or VTI?
KNCT yields 0.65% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than KNCT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. KNCT led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.