KONG vs SCHH
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Schwab US REIT ETF
Which is better, KONG or SCHH?
Each has led over a different period.
SCHH has a lower expense ratio. KONG led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, SCHH over 3Y. KONG is less concentrated, with 43.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KONG | SCHH |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.07%Best |
| AUM | $23M | $10.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.34% | 3.08% |
| Holdings | 106 | 120 |
| YTD Return | +8.48%Best | +8.22% |
| 1Y Return | +9.69%Best | +8.03% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.30% | +10.69%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.61%Best | +1.48% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.2%Best | 18.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.0%Best | -33.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,772Best | $10,762 |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.3%Best | 51.2% |
| Fund Family | Formidable Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 21, 2021 | Jan 13, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 22, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.2 years).
KONG vs SCHH growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.2 years both funds cover.
KONG vs SCHH Performance
Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) is an ETF from Formidable Funds and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year KONG returned +9.69% while SCHH returned +8.03%. Year to date, KONG is up 8.48% versus a gain of 8.22% for SCHH.
Over three years, KONG compounded at +9.30% per year against +10.69% for SCHH; over five years the annualized figures are +6.61% and +1.48% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 12.2% for KONG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.0% for KONG and -33.3% for SCHH. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KONG charges 0.89% per year while SCHH charges 0.07%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $7 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KONG currently yields 0.34% against 3.08% for SCHH.
Holdings Overlap
2.4% of KONG's money is in holdings SCHH also owns. 0.8% of SCHH's money is in holdings KONG also owns.
KONG and SCHH share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in KONG and 119 in SCHH, against full books of 106 and 120.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 34 and 119 positions we hold weights for.
KONG holds 33 positions SCHH does not, 98.5% of the fund.
Largest: NOW 6.66%, MSFT 6.30%, FAST 4.26%, EME 4.19%, FFIV 4.03%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KONG | Weight in SCHH | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GLPIGaming And Leisure Properties Inc | 2.43% | 0.82% | 1.61% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KONG and SCHH you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KONG or SCHH?
KONG has an expense ratio of 0.89% while SCHH charges 0.07%. SCHH is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KONG or SCHH?
Over the past year KONG returned +9.69% vs +8.03% for SCHH, so KONG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KONG or SCHH?
SCHH has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 12.2% for KONG. Worst drawdown: KONG -20.0% vs SCHH -33.3%.
Should I hold both KONG and SCHH?
KONG and SCHH have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KONG and SCHH?
2.4% of KONG's money is in holdings SCHH also owns. 0.8% of SCHH's is in holdings KONG also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in KONG and 119 in SCHH.
Which pays a higher dividend, KONG or SCHH?
KONG yields 0.34% while SCHH yields 3.08%, so SCHH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHH better than KONG?
SCHH has a lower expense ratio. KONG led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, SCHH over 3Y. KONG is less concentrated, with 43.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.