KONG vs TPLC
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF
Which is better, KONG or TPLC?
Each has led over a different period.
TPLC has a lower expense ratio. KONG led over 1Y, TPLC over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. TPLC is less concentrated, with 7.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KONG | TPLC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.52%Best |
| AUM | $23M | $311M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.34% | 0.86% |
| Holdings | 106 | 542 |
| YTD Return | +8.48% | +8.72%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.69%Best | +9.22% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.30% | +13.58%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.61% | +7.65%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.2%Best | 16.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.0%Best | -21.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,772 | $14,457Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.3% | 7.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Formidable Funds | Timothy Plan |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 21, 2021 | May 5, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 22, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.2 years).
KONG vs TPLC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.2 years both funds cover.
KONG vs TPLC Performance
Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) is an ETF from Formidable Funds and Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core ETF (TPLC) is an ETF from Timothy Plan. Over the past year KONG returned +9.69% while TPLC returned +9.22%. Year to date, KONG is up 8.48% versus a gain of 8.72% for TPLC.
Over three years, KONG compounded at +9.30% per year against +13.58% for TPLC; over five years the annualized figures are +6.61% and +7.65% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TPLC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 12.2% for KONG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.0% for KONG and -21.6% for TPLC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KONG charges 0.89% per year while TPLC charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $52 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KONG currently yields 0.34% against 0.86% for TPLC.
Holdings Overlap
61.7% of KONG's money is in holdings TPLC also owns. 6.4% of TPLC's money is in holdings KONG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in KONG and 268 in TPLC, against full books of 106 and 542.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 242 positions for TPLC that do not appear in our book for KONG (90.8% of the fund), and 15 for KONG that do not appear in TPLC (39.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KONG | Weight in TPLC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOWServicenow, Inc. | 6.66% | 0.43% | 6.23% |
| FASTFastenal Co. | 4.26% | 0.47% | 3.79% |
| FFIVF5 Networks Inc. | 4.03% | 0.49% | 3.54% |
| EMEEmcor Group Inc | 4.19% | 0.26% | 3.93% |
| TPLTexas Pacific Land Trust | 3.76% | 0.22% | 3.54% |
| IBKRInteractive Brokers Group Inc | 3.63% | 0.35% | 3.28% |
| SNASnap-On Inc. | 3.29% | 0.52% | 2.77% |
| SNPSSynopsys | 3.26% | 0.22% | 3.04% |
| CBOEC B O E Holdings Inc. | 3.00% | 0.48% | 2.52% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc. | 3.17% | 0.30% | 2.87% |
61.7% of KONG is already inside TPLC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KONG or TPLC?
KONG has an expense ratio of 0.89% while TPLC charges 0.52%. TPLC is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KONG or TPLC?
Over the past year KONG returned +9.69% vs +9.22% for TPLC, so KONG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KONG or TPLC?
TPLC has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 12.2% for KONG. Worst drawdown: KONG -20.0% vs TPLC -21.6%.
Should I hold both KONG and TPLC?
KONG and TPLC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KONG and TPLC?
61.7% of KONG's money is in holdings TPLC also owns. 6.4% of TPLC's is in holdings KONG also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in KONG and 268 in TPLC.
Which pays a higher dividend, KONG or TPLC?
KONG yields 0.34% while TPLC yields 0.86%, so TPLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TPLC better than KONG?
TPLC has a lower expense ratio. KONG led over 1Y, TPLC over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. TPLC is less concentrated, with 7.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.