KPHO vs VTI
KraneShares Dragon Capital Growth of Vietnam Index ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, KPHO or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KPHO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 11.43% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 38 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -12.45% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Top 10 Weight | 70.4% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | KraneShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
KPHO vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
KPHO vs VTI Performance
KraneShares Dragon Capital Growth of Vietnam Index ETF (KPHO) is an ETF from KraneShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, KPHO is down 12.45% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KPHO charges 1.02% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $3 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KPHO currently yields 11.43% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
0.7% of KPHO's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in KPHO and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 38 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,156 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for KPHO (97.6% of the fund), and 3 for KPHO that do not appear in VTI (0.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KPHO | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DHCDong Hai Jsc Of Bentre | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.74% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KPHO and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KPHO or VTI?
KPHO has an expense ratio of 1.02% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $99 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, KPHO or VTI?
KPHO yields 11.43% while VTI yields 1.06%, so KPHO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than KPHO?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.