KTUP vs VYM
T-REX 2X Long KTOS Daily Target ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, KTUP or VYM?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KTUP | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 11.99% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 4 | 608 |
| YTD Return | -86.27% | +11.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | -92.10% | +15.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 104.5% | 10.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -94.8% | -6.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $1,128 | $11,675Best |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.1 years).
KTUP vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
KTUP vs VYM Performance
T-REX 2X Long KTOS Daily Target ETF (KTUP) is an ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KTUP returned -92.10% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, KTUP is down 86.27% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KTUP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 104.5% compared with 10.8% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.8% for KTUP and -6.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KTUP charges 1.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $4 annually, a gap of $146 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KTUP currently yields 11.99% against 2.37% for VYM.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of KTUP and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KTUP or VYM?
KTUP has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $146 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KTUP or VYM?
Over the past year KTUP returned -92.10% vs +15.96% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), KTUP annualized -86.24% vs +15.12% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KTUP or VYM?
KTUP has been the more volatile fund at 104.5% annualized versus 10.8% for VYM. Worst drawdown: KTUP -94.8% vs VYM -6.7%.
Should I hold both KTUP and VYM?
KTUP and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, KTUP or VYM?
KTUP yields 11.99% while VYM yields 2.37%, so KTUP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than KTUP?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.