KWH vs VXUS
GMO Power Infrastructure ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, KWH or VXUS?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KWH | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $55M | $163.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.34% |
| Holdings | 72 | 8,844 |
| YTD Return | -5.64% | +10.00%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.01% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.55% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.55% |
| Fund Family | GMO | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 14, 2026 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
KWH vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
KWH vs VXUS Performance
GMO Power Infrastructure ETF (KWH) is an ETF from GMO and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, KWH is down 5.64% versus a gain of 10.00% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KWH charges 0.60% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $5 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KWH currently yields 0.00% against 2.34% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 33.4% of KWH's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 91.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
22 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in KWH and 8,425 in VXUS, against full books of 72 and 8,844.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KWH | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SU:PASchneider Electric | 4.50% | 0.40% | 4.10% |
| SIE:SGSiemens Ag Reg Common Stock | 4.20% | 0.53% | 3.67% |
| IBE:MAIberdrola S.A. | 2.70% | 0.35% | 2.35% |
| ABBN:SMAbb Ltd.[Abbn] | 2.20% | 0.33% | 1.87% |
| VWS:COVestas Wind Systems A/S Shs New | 2.20% | 0.07% | 2.13% |
| 3750:SHContemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd Ordinary Shares - Class H | 2.20% | 0.03% | 2.17% |
| EOAN:FFE.on Se Common Stock | 1.90% | 0.10% | 1.80% |
| 006400:KRSamsung Sdi Co Ltd | 1.60% | 0.05% | 1.55% |
| 373220:KRLg Energy Solution | 1.60% | 0.03% | 1.57% |
| 7011:JPMitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd. Com Stk | 1.20% | 0.17% | 1.03% |
33.4% of KWH is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KWH or VXUS?
KWH has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between KWH and VXUS?
At least 33.4% of KWH's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in KWH and 8,425 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, KWH or VXUS?
KWH yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.34%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than KWH?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.