LAPR vs MRNY

LAPR vs MRNY

Which is better, LAPR or MRNY?

MRNY has been ahead.

LAPR has a lower expense ratio. MRNY led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: LAPRHigher Returns: MRNY

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricLAPRMRNY
Expense Ratio0.79%Best1.00%
AUM$11M$243M
Dividend Yield5.48%41.90%
Holdings3031
YTD Return+0.12%+474.68%Best
1Y Return+0.02%+504.76%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.31%
Volatility (annualized)1.6%Best107.1%
Max Drawdown-3.8%Best-82.2%
$10,000 over 2.5 years$10,809$14,356Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustYieldMax ETF
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionApr 1, 2024Oct 23, 2023

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 1, 2024 to Oct 15, 2026 (2.5 years).

LAPR vs MRNY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare LAPR against instead:LAPR vs SPYLAPR vs QQQLAPR vs VOOLAPR vs VTIMRNY against:MRNY vs VXUS

LAPR vs MRNY Performance

Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year LAPR returned +0.02% while MRNY returned +504.76%. Year to date, LAPR is up 0.12% versus a gain of 474.68% for MRNY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

MRNY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 107.1% compared with 1.6% for LAPR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.8% for LAPR and -82.2% for MRNY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.32. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

LAPR charges 0.79% per year while MRNY charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $100 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LAPR currently yields 5.48% against 41.90% for MRNY.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of LAPR and MRNY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

LAPRMRNY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, LAPR or MRNY?

LAPR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while MRNY charges 1.00%. LAPR is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, LAPR or MRNY?

Over the past year LAPR returned +0.02% vs +504.76% for MRNY, so MRNY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, LAPR or MRNY?

MRNY has been the more volatile fund at 107.1% annualized versus 1.6% for LAPR. Worst drawdown: LAPR -3.8% vs MRNY -82.2%.

Should I hold both LAPR and MRNY?

LAPR and MRNY have a monthly-return correlation of -0.32, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, LAPR or MRNY?

LAPR yields 5.48% while MRNY yields 41.90%, so MRNY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is MRNY better than LAPR?

LAPR has a lower expense ratio. MRNY led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.