LDRX vs QLTY
SGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF vs GMO US Quality ETF
Which is better, LDRX or QLTY?
QLTY has been ahead.
QLTY has a lower expense ratio. QLTY led over 1Y and the full window. QLTY is less concentrated, with 45.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LDRX | QLTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $261M | $5.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.97% | 0.66% |
| Holdings | 104 | 90 |
| YTD Return | +13.27% | +14.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.78% | +20.95%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.84% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -10.6%Best | -11.7% |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $13,893 | $13,994Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.2% | 45.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Summit Global Investments | GMO |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 5, 2025 | Nov 13, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 5, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.4 years).
LDRX vs QLTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
LDRX vs QLTY Performance
SGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF (LDRX) is an ETF from Summit Global Investments and GMO US Quality ETF (QLTY) is an ETF from GMO. Over the past year LDRX returned +16.78% while QLTY returned +20.95%. Year to date, LDRX is up 13.27% versus a gain of 14.13% for QLTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LDRX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 12.1% for QLTY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.6% for LDRX and -11.7% for QLTY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LDRX charges 0.59% per year while QLTY charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $50 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LDRX currently yields 0.97% against 0.66% for QLTY.
Holdings Overlap
62.0% of LDRX's money is in holdings QLTY also owns. 78.1% of QLTY's money is in holdings LDRX also owns.
Most of QLTY is already inside LDRX. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
27 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in LDRX and 45 in QLTY, against full books of 104 and 90.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 100 and 45 positions we hold weights for.
QLTY holds 18 positions LDRX does not, 21.6% of the fund.
Largest: KLAC 2.70%, ARMK 2.20%, SNPS 1.80%, HLT 1.70%, ELV 1.50%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LDRX | Weight in QLTY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.76% | 8.00% | 0.24% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 11.55% | 3.30% | 8.25% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 9.87% | 4.20% | 5.67% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 7.61% | 4.90% | 2.71% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.13% | 3.50% | 1.63% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.28% | 4.80% | 1.52% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.43% | 3.70% | 0.27% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.25% | 4.10% | 2.85% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 0.85% | 4.20% | 3.35% |
| TMOThermo Fisherscientific Inc. | 0.47% | 4.30% | 3.83% |
78.1% of QLTY is already inside LDRX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LDRX or QLTY?
LDRX has an expense ratio of 0.59% while QLTY charges 0.50%. QLTY is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LDRX or QLTY?
Over the past year LDRX returned +16.78% vs +20.95% for QLTY, so QLTY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LDRX annualized +26.47% vs +27.13% for QLTY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LDRX or QLTY?
LDRX has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 12.1% for QLTY. Worst drawdown: LDRX -10.6% vs QLTY -11.7%.
Should I hold both LDRX and QLTY?
LDRX and QLTY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LDRX and QLTY?
78.1% of QLTY's money is in holdings LDRX also owns. 78.1% of QLTY's is in holdings LDRX also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in LDRX and 45 in QLTY.
Which pays a higher dividend, LDRX or QLTY?
LDRX yields 0.97% while QLTY yields 0.66%, so LDRX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QLTY better than LDRX?
QLTY has a lower expense ratio. QLTY led over 1Y and the full window. QLTY is less concentrated, with 45.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.