LGDX vs SECT
Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF vs Main Sector Rotation ETF
Which is better, LGDX or SECT?
Nearly the same fund. LGDX costs less.
LGDX has a lower expense ratio. LGDX led over 1Y, SECT over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. LGDX is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LGDX | SECT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25%Best | 0.69% |
| AUM | $147M | $2.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.47% | 0.69% |
| Holdings | 590 | 19 |
| YTD Return | +11.53%Best | +10.58% |
| 1Y Return | +14.44%Best | +14.28% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.91% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.81% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5%Best | 14.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.8%Best | -17.6% |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $12,640 | $12,986Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.6%Best | 100.0% |
| Fund Family | Intech ETF | Main Management ETF Advisors, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 1, 2025 | Sep 5, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 28, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.6 years).
LGDX vs SECT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
LGDX vs SECT Performance
Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF (LGDX) is an ETF from Intech ETF and Main Sector Rotation ETF (SECT) is an ETF from Main Management ETF Advisors, LLC. Over the past year LGDX returned +14.44% while SECT returned +14.28%. Year to date, LGDX is up 11.53% versus a gain of 10.58% for SECT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SECT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 12.5% for LGDX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.8% for LGDX and -17.6% for SECT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LGDX charges 0.25% per year while SECT charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $69 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LGDX currently yields 0.47% against 0.69% for SECT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 295 holdings in LGDX and 10 in SECT, totalling 100.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 295 positions we hold weights for in LGDX and 10 in SECT, against full books of 590 and 19.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for SECT that do not appear in our book for LGDX (100.0% of the fund), and 291 for LGDX that do not appear in SECT (99.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LGDX and SECT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LGDX or SECT?
LGDX has an expense ratio of 0.25% while SECT charges 0.69%. LGDX is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LGDX or SECT?
Over the past year LGDX returned +14.44% vs +14.28% for SECT, so LGDX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LGDX annualized +15.77% vs +17.74% for SECT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LGDX or SECT?
SECT has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 12.5% for LGDX. Worst drawdown: LGDX -15.8% vs SECT -17.6%.
Should I hold both LGDX and SECT?
LGDX and SECT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, LGDX or SECT?
LGDX yields 0.47% while SECT yields 0.69%, so SECT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SECT better than LGDX?
LGDX has a lower expense ratio. LGDX led over 1Y, SECT over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. LGDX is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.