LGHT vs VTI
Langar Global Healthtech ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, LGHT or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 75.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LGHT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 32 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +8.88% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.57% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -28.6% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $10,692 | $16,556Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 75.5% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Langar Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 10, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 10, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.8 years).
LGHT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.8 years both funds cover.
LGHT vs VTI Performance
Langar Global Healthtech ETF (LGHT) is an ETF from Langar Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LGHT returned +8.57% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, LGHT is up 8.88% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LGHT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 12.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.6% for LGHT and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LGHT charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LGHT currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
84.0% of LGHT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.6% of VTI's money is in holdings LGHT also owns.
Most of LGHT is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
26 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in LGHT and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 32 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,143 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for LGHT (97.0% of the fund), and 2 for LGHT that do not appear in VTI (5.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LGHT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRNAModerna therapeutics | 14.85% | 0.07% | 14.78% |
| VEEVVeeva Systems Inc | 9.35% | 0.06% | 9.29% |
| RMDResmed Inc. | 8.98% | 0.05% | 8.93% |
| IQVI Q V I A Holdings Inc. | 8.63% | 0.06% | 8.57% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc. | 8.10% | 0.18% | 7.92% |
| GEHCGe Healthcare Technologies Inc | 6.38% | 0.04% | 6.34% |
| DXCMDexcom Inc. | 5.67% | 0.05% | 5.62% |
| PODDInsulet Corporation | 3.37% | 0.01% | 3.36% |
| ZBHZimmer Biomet Holdings | 3.15% | 0.03% | 3.12% |
| ALGNAlign Technology Inc. | 3.12% | 0.01% | 3.11% |
84.0% of LGHT is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LGHT or VTI?
LGHT has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LGHT or VTI?
Over the past year LGHT returned +8.57% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LGHT or VTI?
LGHT has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 12.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: LGHT -28.6% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both LGHT and VTI?
LGHT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LGHT and VTI?
84.0% of LGHT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.6% of VTI's is in holdings LGHT also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in LGHT and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, LGHT or VTI?
LGHT yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than LGHT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 75.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.