LJAN vs SIXZ
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January vs AllianzIM US Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF
Which is better, LJAN or SIXZ?
SIXZ has been ahead.
SIXZ has a lower expense ratio. SIXZ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LJAN | SIXZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.74%Best |
| AUM | $12M | $65M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.91% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 19 | 15 |
| YTD Return | +0.71% | +9.88%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.12% | +11.53%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.8%Best | 6.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -5.9%Best | -10.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $10,078 | $13,110Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | AllianzIM |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Jan 2, 2024 | Apr 30, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 1, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.5 years).
LJAN vs SIXZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
LJAN vs SIXZ Performance
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January (LJAN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and AllianzIM US Equity 6 Month Buffer10 May/Nov ETF (SIXZ) is an ETF from AllianzIM. Over the past year LJAN returned +0.12% while SIXZ returned +11.53%. Year to date, LJAN is up 0.71% versus a gain of 9.88% for SIXZ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SIXZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 6.0% compared with 1.8% for LJAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.9% for LJAN and -10.3% for SIXZ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LJAN charges 0.79% per year while SIXZ charges 0.74%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $74 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LJAN currently yields 4.91% against 0.00% for SIXZ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LJAN and SIXZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LJAN or SIXZ?
LJAN has an expense ratio of 0.79% while SIXZ charges 0.74%. SIXZ is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LJAN or SIXZ?
Over the past year LJAN returned +0.12% vs +11.53% for SIXZ, so SIXZ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LJAN or SIXZ?
SIXZ has been the more volatile fund at 6.0% annualized versus 1.8% for LJAN. Worst drawdown: LJAN -5.9% vs SIXZ -10.3%.
Should I hold both LJAN and SIXZ?
LJAN and SIXZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, LJAN or SIXZ?
LJAN yields 4.91% while SIXZ yields 0.00%, so LJAN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SIXZ better than LJAN?
SIXZ has a lower expense ratio. SIXZ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.