LJAN vs ZJUN
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January vs Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June
Which is better, LJAN or ZJUN?
ZJUN has been ahead.
ZJUN led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LJAN | ZJUN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Tie | 0.79%Tie |
| AUM | $12M | $153M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.91% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 19 | 21 |
| YTD Return | +0.71% | +3.53%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.12% | +4.82%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.0% | 1.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -2.9% | -1.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $10,102 | $10,787Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Jan 2, 2024 | Jun 2, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 2, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.4 years).
LJAN vs ZJUN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
LJAN vs ZJUN Performance
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - January (LJAN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June (ZJUN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year LJAN returned +0.12% while ZJUN returned +4.82%. Year to date, LJAN is up 0.71% versus a gain of 3.53% for ZJUN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LJAN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 2.0% compared with 1.4% for ZJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.9% for LJAN and -1.1% for ZJUN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LJAN charges 0.79% per year while ZJUN charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, LJAN currently yields 4.91% against 0.00% for ZJUN.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LJAN and ZJUN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LJAN or ZJUN?
LJAN has an expense ratio of 0.79% while ZJUN charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, LJAN or ZJUN?
Over the past year LJAN returned +0.12% vs +4.82% for ZJUN, so ZJUN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LJAN annualized +0.73% vs +5.56% for ZJUN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LJAN or ZJUN?
LJAN has been the more volatile fund at 2.0% annualized versus 1.4% for ZJUN. Worst drawdown: LJAN -2.9% vs ZJUN -1.1%.
Should I hold both LJAN and ZJUN?
LJAN and ZJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, LJAN or ZJUN?
LJAN yields 4.91% while ZJUN yields 0.00%, so LJAN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZJUN better than LJAN?
ZJUN led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.