LRGC vs OAIW
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF vs OpenAI Lab Ecosystem ETF
Which is better, LRGC or OAIW?
LRGC costs less.
LRGC has a lower expense ratio. LRGC is less concentrated, with 44.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LRGC | OAIW |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $1.4B | $6M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.53% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 72 | 25 |
| YTD Return | +10.99%Best | -10.04% |
| 1Y Return | +13.29% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.81% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.8%Best | 60.5% |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2023 | Aug 12, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
LRGC vs OAIW growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
LRGC vs OAIW Performance
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and OpenAI Lab Ecosystem ETF (OAIW) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Year to date, LRGC is up 10.99% versus a loss of 10.04% for OAIW.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LRGC charges 0.39% per year while OAIW charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $59 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LRGC currently yields 0.53% against 0.00% for OAIW.
Holdings Overlap
27.0% of LRGC's money is in holdings OAIW also owns. 31.0% of OAIW's money is in holdings LRGC also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
7 positions in common, counted across the 69 positions we hold weights for in LRGC and 26 in OAIW, against full books of 72 and 25.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 13 positions for OAIW that do not appear in our book for LRGC (43.5% of the fund), and 59 for LRGC that do not appear in OAIW (70.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LRGC | Weight in OAIW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.66% | 7.58% | 0.92% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.71% | 5.11% | 3.60% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.69% | 5.62% | 0.93% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.93% | 4.38% | 1.45% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 1.33% | 4.33% | 3.00% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.59% | 2.02% | 0.43% |
| AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc | 1.05% | 1.96% | 0.91% |
31.0% of OAIW is already inside LRGC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LRGC or OAIW?
LRGC has an expense ratio of 0.39% while OAIW charges 0.59%. LRGC is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between LRGC and OAIW?
31.0% of OAIW's money is in holdings LRGC also owns. 31.0% of OAIW's is in holdings LRGC also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 69 positions we hold weights for in LRGC and 26 in OAIW.
Which pays a higher dividend, LRGC or OAIW?
LRGC yields 0.53% while OAIW yields 0.00%, so LRGC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is OAIW better than LRGC?
LRGC has a lower expense ratio. LRGC is less concentrated, with 44.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.