LRGC vs PCLG
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF vs Polen Focus Growth ETF
Which is better, LRGC or PCLG?
LRGC has been ahead.
LRGC has a lower expense ratio. LRGC led over 1Y and the full window. LRGC is less concentrated, with 44.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LRGC | PCLG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $1.4B | $92M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.53% | 0.04% |
| Holdings | 72 | 27 |
| YTD Return | +10.99%Best | -5.60% |
| 1Y Return | +13.29%Best | -8.10% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.81% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.1%Best | 17.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.0%Best | -23.8% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,259Best | $9,249 |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.8%Best | 62.6% |
| Fund Family | AllianceBernstein L.P. | Polen Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2023 | Sep 30, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1 years).
LRGC vs PCLG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
LRGC vs PCLG Performance
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P. and Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) is an ETF from Polen Capital. Over the past year LRGC returned +13.29% while PCLG returned -8.10%. Year to date, LRGC is up 10.99% versus a loss of 5.60% for PCLG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PCLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 12.1% for LRGC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.0% for LRGC and -23.8% for PCLG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LRGC charges 0.39% per year while PCLG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $49 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LRGC currently yields 0.53% against 0.04% for PCLG.
Holdings Overlap
40.4% of LRGC's money is in holdings PCLG also owns. 56.9% of PCLG's money is in holdings LRGC also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 69 positions we hold weights for in LRGC and 29 in PCLG, against full books of 72 and 27.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 14 positions for PCLG that do not appear in our book for LRGC (37.1% of the fund), and 55 for LRGC that do not appear in PCLG (57.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LRGC | Weight in PCLG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.71% | 7.82% | 0.89% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.66% | 9.35% | 2.69% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 6.09% | 6.16% | 0.07% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.69% | 5.98% | 1.29% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.93% | 6.13% | 3.20% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 3.14% | 5.67% | 2.53% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.44% | 4.38% | 0.94% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 0.80% | 4.80% | 4.00% |
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 1.33% | 1.96% | 0.63% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 0.94% | 1.74% | 0.80% |
56.9% of PCLG is already inside LRGC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LRGC or PCLG?
LRGC has an expense ratio of 0.39% while PCLG charges 0.49%. LRGC is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LRGC or PCLG?
Over the past year LRGC returned +13.29% vs -8.10% for PCLG, so LRGC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LRGC annualized +12.59% vs -7.51% for PCLG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LRGC or PCLG?
PCLG has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 12.1% for LRGC. Worst drawdown: LRGC -10.0% vs PCLG -23.8%.
Should I hold both LRGC and PCLG?
LRGC and PCLG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LRGC and PCLG?
56.9% of PCLG's money is in holdings LRGC also owns. 56.9% of PCLG's is in holdings LRGC also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 69 positions we hold weights for in LRGC and 29 in PCLG.
Which pays a higher dividend, LRGC or PCLG?
LRGC yields 0.53% while PCLG yields 0.04%, so LRGC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PCLG better than LRGC?
LRGC has a lower expense ratio. LRGC led over 1Y and the full window. LRGC is less concentrated, with 44.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.