LSGR vs PJFG
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF vs PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF
Which is better, LSGR or PJFG?
PJFG has been ahead.
LSGR has a lower expense ratio. PJFG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. PJFG is less concentrated, with 61.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 76.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LSGR | PJFG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $929M | $148M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 44 | 78 |
| YTD Return | +2.25% | +8.89%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.06% | +10.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.65% | +22.92%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.8%Tie | 17.8%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -22.9%Best | -24.2% |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $18,236 | $18,995Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 76.0% | 61.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Natixis Funds | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2023 | Dec 12, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 29, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.3 years).
LSGR vs PJFG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.
LSGR vs PJFG Performance
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF (LSGR) is an ETF from Natixis Funds and PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year LSGR returned +3.06% while PJFG returned +10.08%. Year to date, LSGR is up 2.25% versus a gain of 8.89% for PJFG.
Over three years, LSGR compounded at +21.65% per year against +22.92% for PJFG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LSGR and PJFG have been equally volatile, both at 17.8% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.9% for LSGR and -24.2% for PJFG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LSGR charges 0.59% per year while PJFG charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $75 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LSGR currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PJFG.
Holdings Overlap
74.9% of LSGR's money is in holdings PJFG also owns. 45.5% of PJFG's money is in holdings LSGR also owns.
Most of LSGR is already inside PJFG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
11 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in LSGR and 37 in PJFG, against full books of 44 and 78.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 23 positions for PJFG that do not appear in our book for LSGR (50.3% of the fund), and 10 for LSGR that do not appear in PJFG (24.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LSGR | Weight in PJFG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 18.76% | 12.21% | 6.55% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 11.66% | 9.23% | 2.43% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 9.04% | 4.17% | 4.87% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.62% | 5.20% | 2.42% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.07% | 6.42% | 0.35% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 6.14% | 2.57% | 3.57% |
| VRTXNvaesrtex Pharmaceuticals Inc | 4.72% | 1.45% | 3.27% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 3.38% | 1.54% | 1.84% |
| BABoeing Co | 3.22% | 0.96% | 2.26% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc. | 2.16% | 1.07% | 1.09% |
74.9% of LSGR is already inside PJFG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LSGR or PJFG?
LSGR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while PJFG charges 0.75%. LSGR is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LSGR or PJFG?
Over the past year LSGR returned +3.06% vs +10.08% for PJFG, so PJFG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LSGR or PJFG?
LSGR and PJFG have been equally volatile, both at 17.8% annualized. Worst drawdown: LSGR -22.9% vs PJFG -24.2%.
Should I hold both LSGR and PJFG?
LSGR and PJFG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LSGR and PJFG?
74.9% of LSGR's money is in holdings PJFG also owns. 45.5% of PJFG's is in holdings LSGR also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in LSGR and 37 in PJFG.
Which pays a higher dividend, LSGR or PJFG?
LSGR yields 0.00% while PJFG yields 0.00%, so PJFG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PJFG better than LSGR?
LSGR has a lower expense ratio. PJFG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. PJFG is less concentrated, with 61.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 76.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.