LVDS vs QQQ
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, LVDS or QQQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. LVDS led over 1Y, QQQ over the full window. LVDS is less concentrated, with 30.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LVDS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $114M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.56% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 133 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +20.52%Best | +19.30% |
| 1Y Return | +25.95%Best | +22.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.6%Best | 19.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -6.6%Best | -12.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $13,088 | $13,325Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 30.3%Best | 46.7% |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
LVDS vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
LVDS vs QQQ Performance
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year LVDS returned +25.95% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, LVDS is up 20.52% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.9% compared with 10.6% for LVDS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.6% for LVDS and -12.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LVDS charges 0.30% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $18 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LVDS currently yields 7.56% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
31.6% of LVDS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 44.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings LVDS also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
27 positions in common, counted across the 131 positions we hold weights for in LVDS and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 133 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 65 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for LVDS (51.4% of the fund), and 101 for LVDS that do not appear in QQQ (67.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LVDS | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.39% | 7.35% | 1.96% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.92% | 5.76% | 0.16% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.39% | 4.07% | 2.32% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.49% | 5.02% | 4.53% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 0.63% | 4.17% | 3.54% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 1.29% | 3.26% | 1.97% |
| INTCIntel Corp. | 0.63% | 2.64% | 2.01% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 0.98% | 2.11% | 1.13% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 1.26% | 0.80% | 0.46% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.28% | 1.77% | 1.49% |
44.9% of QQQ is already inside LVDS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LVDS or QQQ?
LVDS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LVDS or QQQ?
Over the past year LVDS returned +25.95% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so LVDS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LVDS annualized +23.00% vs +24.71% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LVDS or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.9% annualized versus 10.6% for LVDS. Worst drawdown: LVDS -6.6% vs QQQ -12.0%.
Should I hold both LVDS and QQQ?
LVDS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LVDS and QQQ?
44.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings LVDS also owns. 44.9% of QQQ's is in holdings LVDS also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 131 positions we hold weights for in LVDS and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, LVDS or QQQ?
LVDS yields 7.56% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so LVDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than LVDS?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. LVDS led over 1Y, QQQ over the full window. LVDS is less concentrated, with 30.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.