MAKX vs VTI
Proshares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, MAKX or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MAKX led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MAKX | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 25 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +30.01%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +28.22%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.14%Best | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.00% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.8% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -40.3% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,851 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 59.1% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2021 to Oct 12, 2026 (5 years).
MAKX vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5 years both funds cover.
MAKX vs VTI Performance
Proshares S&P Kensho Smart Factories ETF (MAKX) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MAKX returned +28.22% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, MAKX is up 30.01% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, MAKX compounded at +28.14% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.00% and +11.99% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAKX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.8% compared with 15.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.3% for MAKX and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MAKX charges 0.58% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MAKX currently yields 0.08% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
83.7% of MAKX's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 7.9% of VTI's money is in holdings MAKX also owns.
Most of MAKX is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
19 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in MAKX and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 25 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,143 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for MAKX (89.7% of the fund), and 1 for MAKX that do not appear in VTI (2.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MAKX | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 3.39% | 6.88% | 3.49% |
| OUSTOuster Inc_None_None | 8.55% | 0.00% | 8.55% |
| DDD3D Systems Corporation | 7.81% | 0.00% | 7.81% |
| EMREmerson Electric Co. | 6.18% | 0.12% | 6.06% |
| CGNXCognex Corp - Common | 5.91% | 0.01% | 5.90% |
| ROKRockwell Automation | 5.60% | 0.06% | 5.54% |
| ADSKAutodesk, Inc. | 4.94% | 0.07% | 4.87% |
| AMBQAmbiq Micro Inc | 4.97% | 0.00% | 4.97% |
| ZBRAZebra Technologies Corp | 4.92% | 0.02% | 4.90% |
| ALNTAllient Inc | 4.59% | 0.00% | 4.59% |
83.7% of MAKX is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MAKX or VTI?
MAKX has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MAKX or VTI?
Over the past year MAKX returned +28.22% vs +16.63% for VTI, so MAKX leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MAKX or VTI?
MAKX has been the more volatile fund at 28.8% annualized versus 15.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MAKX -40.3% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both MAKX and VTI?
MAKX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MAKX and VTI?
83.7% of MAKX's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 7.9% of VTI's is in holdings MAKX also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in MAKX and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, MAKX or VTI?
MAKX yields 0.08% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than MAKX?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. MAKX led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.