MBSF vs VETZ

MBSF vs VETZ

Which is better, MBSF or VETZ?

MBSF has been ahead.

VETZ has a lower expense ratio. MBSF led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VETZHigher Returns: MBSF

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMBSFVETZ
Expense Ratio0.49%0.35%Best
AUM$243M$129M
Dividend Yield4.31%6.27%
Holdings446155
YTD Return+2.34%Best-1.64%
1Y Return+4.19%Best-0.63%
3Y Return (annualized)-+5.01%
Volatility (annualized)1.6%Best4.6%
Max Drawdown-1.1%Best-5.0%
$10,000 over 2.6 years$11,446Best$11,021
Fund FamilyRegan CapitalAcademy Asset Management
CategoryFixed IncomeFixed Income
StyleBank LoanBank Loan
InceptionFeb 27, 2024Aug 1, 2023

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 28, 2024 to Oct 15, 2026 (2.6 years).

MBSF vs VETZ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.

Compare MBSF against instead:MBSF vs SPYMBSF vs QQQMBSF vs VOOMBSF vs VTIVETZ against:VETZ vs VXUS

MBSF vs VETZ Performance

REGAN FLOATING RATE MBS ETF (MBSF) is an ETF from Regan Capital and Academy Veteran Bond ETF (VETZ) is an ETF from Academy Asset Management. Over the past year MBSF returned +4.19% while VETZ returned -0.63%. Year to date, MBSF is up 2.34% versus a loss of 1.64% for VETZ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VETZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 4.6% compared with 1.6% for MBSF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.1% for MBSF and -5.0% for VETZ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MBSF charges 0.49% per year while VETZ charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $35 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MBSF currently yields 4.31% against 6.27% for VETZ.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 27 holdings in MBSF and 9 in VETZ, totalling 7.8% and 14.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in MBSF and 9 in VETZ, against full books of 446 and 155.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of MBSF and VETZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

MBSFVETZ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MBSF or VETZ?

MBSF has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VETZ charges 0.35%. VETZ is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, MBSF or VETZ?

Over the past year MBSF returned +4.19% vs -0.63% for VETZ, so MBSF leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, MBSF or VETZ?

VETZ has been the more volatile fund at 4.6% annualized versus 1.6% for MBSF. Worst drawdown: MBSF -1.1% vs VETZ -5.0%.

Should I hold both MBSF and VETZ?

MBSF and VETZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, MBSF or VETZ?

MBSF yields 4.31% while VETZ yields 6.27%, so VETZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VETZ better than MBSF?

VETZ has a lower expense ratio. MBSF led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.