MCDS vs PJFM
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF vs PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF
Which is better, MCDS or PJFM?
MCDS has been ahead.
MCDS has a lower expense ratio. MCDS led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. MCDS is less concentrated, with 14.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 31.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MCDS | PJFM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $8M | $20M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.05% | 0.60% |
| Holdings | 208 | 105 |
| YTD Return | +12.25%Best | +2.69% |
| 1Y Return | +15.68%Best | +7.66% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9%Best | 15.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.5%Best | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $13,279Best | $12,402 |
| Top 10 Weight | 14.3%Best | 31.4% |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 7, 2024 | Dec 14, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 8, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.2 years).
MCDS vs PJFM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
MCDS vs PJFM Performance
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and PGIM Jennison Focused Mid-Cap ETF (PJFM) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year MCDS returned +15.68% while PJFM returned +7.66%. Year to date, MCDS is up 12.25% versus a gain of 2.69% for PJFM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PJFM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 12.9% for MCDS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.5% for MCDS and -22.8% for PJFM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MCDS charges 0.35% per year while PJFM charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $49 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MCDS currently yields 1.05% against 0.60% for PJFM.
Holdings Overlap
7.4% of MCDS's money is in holdings PJFM also owns. 25.0% of PJFM's money is in holdings MCDS also owns.
PJFM and MCDS share little of their money.
13 positions in common, counted across the 204 positions we hold weights for in MCDS and 49 in PJFM, against full books of 208 and 105.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 31 positions for PJFM that do not appear in our book for MCDS (62.0% of the fund), and 184 for MCDS that do not appear in PJFM (89.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MCDS | Weight in PJFM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NINisource Inc. | 0.64% | 4.15% | 3.51% |
| CBRECbre Services Inc | 0.72% | 3.04% | 2.32% |
| CMSCms Energy Corp. | 0.84% | 2.34% | 1.50% |
| MCHPMicrochip Technology Inc. | 0.45% | 2.70% | 2.25% |
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 0.22% | 2.41% | 2.19% |
| RLRalph Lauren Corp. Class A | 0.63% | 1.45% | 0.82% |
| BURLBurlington Stores Inc | 0.46% | 1.58% | 1.12% |
| ESIElement Solutions Inc | 0.42% | 1.54% | 1.12% |
| EHCEmcompass Health Corporation | 0.64% | 1.30% | 0.66% |
| AMEAmetek Inc | 0.86% | 1.04% | 0.18% |
25.0% of PJFM is already inside MCDS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MCDS or PJFM?
MCDS has an expense ratio of 0.35% while PJFM charges 0.49%. MCDS is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MCDS or PJFM?
Over the past year MCDS returned +15.68% vs +7.66% for PJFM, so MCDS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MCDS annualized +13.76% vs +10.28% for PJFM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MCDS or PJFM?
PJFM has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 12.9% for MCDS. Worst drawdown: MCDS -22.5% vs PJFM -22.8%.
Should I hold both MCDS and PJFM?
MCDS and PJFM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MCDS and PJFM?
25.0% of PJFM's money is in holdings MCDS also owns. 25.0% of PJFM's is in holdings MCDS also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 204 positions we hold weights for in MCDS and 49 in PJFM.
Which pays a higher dividend, MCDS or PJFM?
MCDS yields 1.05% while PJFM yields 0.60%, so MCDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PJFM better than MCDS?
MCDS has a lower expense ratio. MCDS led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. MCDS is less concentrated, with 14.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 31.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.