MCDS vs TMID

MCDS vs TMID

Which is better, MCDS or TMID?

MCDS costs less.

MCDS has a lower expense ratio. TMID is less concentrated, with 9.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 14.3%.

Lower Fees: MCDSLess Concentrated: TMID

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMCDSTMID
Expense Ratio0.35%Best0.47%
AUM$8M$12M
Dividend Yield1.05%0.00%
Holdings208391
YTD Return+12.25%Best+0.46%
1Y Return+15.68%-
Top 10 Weight14.3%9.6%Best
Fund FamilyJ.P. Morgan Asset ManagementT.Rowe Price
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap BlendMid Cap Blend
InceptionAug 7, 2024Sep 16, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

MCDS vs TMID growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare MCDS against instead:MCDS vs SPYMCDS vs QQQMCDS vs VOOMCDS vs VTITMID against:TMID vs VXUS

MCDS vs TMID Performance

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Equity Research ETF (TMID) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Year to date, MCDS is up 12.25% versus a gain of 0.46% for TMID.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MCDS charges 0.35% per year while TMID charges 0.47%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $47 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MCDS currently yields 1.05% against 0.00% for TMID.

Holdings Overlap

MCDS already in TMID52.5%
TMID already in MCDS35.1%

52.5% of MCDS's money is in holdings TMID also owns. 35.1% of TMID's money is in holdings MCDS also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

101 positions in common, counted across the 204 positions we hold weights for in MCDS and 391 in TMID, against full books of 208 and 391.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 267 positions for TMID that do not appear in our book for MCDS (59.9% of the fund), and 97 for MCDS that do not appear in TMID (44.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in MCDSWeight in TMIDDifference
MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp1.72%0.64%1.08%
NTRANatera Inc1.12%0.69%0.43%
HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co.1.31%0.46%0.85%
ALNYAlnylam Pharmac..0.45%1.31%0.86%
0RMV:LNTechnipfmc Plc Ordinary Shares0.87%0.86%0.01%
STTState Street Corp.1.20%0.40%0.80%
TERTeradyne Inc0.94%0.54%0.40%
ESIElement Solutions Inc0.42%1.05%0.63%
HUMHumana Inc.0.81%0.64%0.17%
VLTOVeralto Corp0.52%0.93%0.41%

52.5% of MCDS is already inside TMID.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

MCDSTMID

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MCDS or TMID?

MCDS has an expense ratio of 0.35% while TMID charges 0.47%. MCDS is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between MCDS and TMID?

52.5% of MCDS's money is in holdings TMID also owns. 35.1% of TMID's is in holdings MCDS also owns. They hold 101 positions in common, counted across the 204 positions we hold weights for in MCDS and 391 in TMID.

Which pays a higher dividend, MCDS or TMID?

MCDS yields 1.05% while TMID yields 0.00%, so MCDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TMID better than MCDS?

MCDS has a lower expense ratio. TMID is less concentrated, with 9.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 14.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.