MDLV vs ROPE
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF vs Coastal Compass 100 ETF
Which is better, MDLV or ROPE?
ROPE has been ahead.
MDLV has a lower expense ratio. ROPE led over 1Y and the full window. MDLV is less concentrated, with 34.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MDLV | ROPE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58%Best | 0.81% |
| AUM | $49M | $23M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.73% | 1.82% |
| Holdings | 78 | 52 |
| YTD Return | +8.36% | +10.40%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.16% | +16.72%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.01% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.5%Best | 11.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.7%Best | -14.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $12,328 | $12,690Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.3%Best | 49.5% |
| Fund Family | Morgan Dempsey | Coastal Compass Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Apr 26, 2023 | Dec 17, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
MDLV vs ROPE growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
MDLV vs ROPE Performance
Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF (MDLV) is an ETF from Morgan Dempsey and Coastal Compass 100 ETF (ROPE) is an ETF from Coastal Compass Funds. Over the past year MDLV returned +11.16% while ROPE returned +16.72%. Year to date, MDLV is up 8.36% versus a gain of 10.40% for ROPE.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ROPE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.4% compared with 9.5% for MDLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.7% for MDLV and -14.3% for ROPE. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MDLV charges 0.58% per year while ROPE charges 0.81%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $81 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MDLV currently yields 2.73% against 1.82% for ROPE.
Holdings Overlap
38.0% of MDLV's money is in holdings ROPE also owns. 30.8% of ROPE's money is in holdings MDLV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in MDLV and 51 in ROPE, against full books of 78 and 52.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 35 positions for ROPE that do not appear in our book for MDLV (68.0% of the fund), and 21 for MDLV that do not appear in ROPE (55.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MDLV | Weight in ROPE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 2.59% | 5.21% | 2.62% |
| UPSUnited Parcel Service, Inc | 2.71% | 4.46% | 1.75% |
| SOSouthern Co. | 1.93% | 4.46% | 2.53% |
| FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund | 1.95% | 3.79% | 1.84% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 3.41% | 1.18% | 2.23% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 3.12% | 1.28% | 1.84% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 3.13% | 1.21% | 1.92% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 2.88% | 1.40% | 1.48% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 2.87% | 1.15% | 1.72% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 2.69% | 1.15% | 1.54% |
38.0% of MDLV is already inside ROPE.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MDLV or ROPE?
MDLV has an expense ratio of 0.58% while ROPE charges 0.81%. MDLV is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MDLV or ROPE?
Over the past year MDLV returned +11.16% vs +16.72% for ROPE, so ROPE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MDLV annualized +12.33% vs +14.15% for ROPE. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MDLV or ROPE?
ROPE has been the more volatile fund at 11.4% annualized versus 9.5% for MDLV. Worst drawdown: MDLV -10.7% vs ROPE -14.3%.
Should I hold both MDLV and ROPE?
MDLV and ROPE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MDLV and ROPE?
38.0% of MDLV's money is in holdings ROPE also owns. 30.8% of ROPE's is in holdings MDLV also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in MDLV and 51 in ROPE.
Which pays a higher dividend, MDLV or ROPE?
MDLV yields 2.73% while ROPE yields 1.82%, so MDLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ROPE better than MDLV?
MDLV has a lower expense ratio. ROPE led over 1Y and the full window. MDLV is less concentrated, with 34.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 49.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.