METU vs NVDQ
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF vs T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
Which is better, METU or NVDQ?
METU has been ahead.
METU has a lower expense ratio. METU led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | METU | NVDQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02%Best | 1.05% |
| AUM | $506M | $14M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.70% | 0.53% |
| Holdings | 20 | 5 |
| YTD Return | +2.89%Best | -47.59% |
| 1Y Return | -17.61%Best | -55.89% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | -82.43% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 70.0% | 51.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -63.9%Best | -95.2% |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $12,474Best | $669 |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | REX Shares |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jun 5, 2024 | Oct 18, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 5, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
METU vs NVDQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
METU vs NVDQ Performance
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) is an ETF from REX Shares. Over the past year METU returned -17.61% while NVDQ returned -55.89%. Year to date, METU is up 2.89% versus a loss of 47.59% for NVDQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
METU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 70.0% compared with 51.0% for NVDQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.9% for METU and -95.2% for NVDQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.38. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
METU charges 1.02% per year while NVDQ charges 1.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $105 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, METU currently yields 2.70% against 0.53% for NVDQ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of METU and NVDQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, METU or NVDQ?
METU has an expense ratio of 1.02% while NVDQ charges 1.05%. METU is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, METU or NVDQ?
Over the past year METU returned -17.61% vs -55.89% for NVDQ, so METU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), METU annualized +9.65% vs -67.59% for NVDQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, METU or NVDQ?
METU has been the more volatile fund at 70.0% annualized versus 51.0% for NVDQ. Worst drawdown: METU -63.9% vs NVDQ -95.2%.
Should I hold both METU and NVDQ?
METU and NVDQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.38, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, METU or NVDQ?
METU yields 2.70% while NVDQ yields 0.53%, so METU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NVDQ better than METU?
METU has a lower expense ratio. METU led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.