METU vs PSCW
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF vs Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF
Which is better, METU or PSCW?
PSCW has been ahead.
PSCW has a lower expense ratio. PSCW led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | METU | PSCW |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $506M | $62M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.70% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 20 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +2.89% | +10.26%Best |
| 1Y Return | -17.61% | +12.60%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.95% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.34% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 70.0% | 5.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -63.9% | -11.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $12,474 | $12,730Best |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Pacer ETFs |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jun 5, 2024 | Mar 31, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 5, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
METU vs PSCW growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
METU vs PSCW Performance
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (April) ETF (PSCW) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year METU returned -17.61% while PSCW returned +12.60%. Year to date, METU is up 2.89% versus a gain of 10.26% for PSCW.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
METU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 70.0% compared with 5.7% for PSCW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.9% for METU and -11.9% for PSCW. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
METU charges 1.02% per year while PSCW charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $49 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, METU currently yields 2.70% against 0.00% for PSCW.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of METU and PSCW you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, METU or PSCW?
METU has an expense ratio of 1.02% while PSCW charges 0.49%. PSCW is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, METU or PSCW?
Over the past year METU returned -17.61% vs +12.60% for PSCW, so PSCW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), METU annualized +9.65% vs +10.58% for PSCW. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, METU or PSCW?
METU has been the more volatile fund at 70.0% annualized versus 5.7% for PSCW. Worst drawdown: METU -63.9% vs PSCW -11.9%.
Should I hold both METU and PSCW?
METU and PSCW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, METU or PSCW?
METU yields 2.70% while PSCW yields 0.00%, so METU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PSCW better than METU?
PSCW has a lower expense ratio. PSCW led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.