MFSG vs NUGO
MFS Active Growth ETF vs Nuveen Growth Opportunities ETF
Which is better, MFSG or NUGO?
Nearly the same fund. MFSG costs less.
MFSG has a lower expense ratio. NUGO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. MFSG is less concentrated, with 53.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFSG | NUGO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $406M | $2.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 69 | 46 |
| YTD Return | +7.53% | +9.42%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.18% | +11.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.57% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5%Best | 18.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.2%Best | -25.1% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $12,025 | $12,365Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 53.3%Best | 61.9% |
| Fund Family | MFS Investment Management | Nuveen |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 5, 2024 | Sep 27, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 5, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
MFSG vs NUGO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
MFSG vs NUGO Performance
MFS Active Growth ETF (MFSG) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management and Nuveen Growth Opportunities ETF (NUGO) is an ETF from Nuveen. Over the past year MFSG returned +9.18% while NUGO returned +11.31%. Year to date, MFSG is up 7.53% versus a gain of 9.42% for NUGO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NUGO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 17.5% for MFSG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.2% for MFSG and -25.1% for NUGO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MFSG charges 0.49% per year while NUGO charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $50 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MFSG currently yields 0.06% against 0.00% for NUGO.
Holdings Overlap
62.7% of MFSG's money is in holdings NUGO also owns. 75.8% of NUGO's money is in holdings MFSG also owns.
Most of NUGO is already inside MFSG. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
22 positions in common, counted across the 67 positions we hold weights for in MFSG and 43 in NUGO, against full books of 69 and 46.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 67 and 43 positions we hold weights for.
MFSG holds 40 positions NUGO does not, 32.0% of the fund.
Largest: V 3.36%, KLAC 1.61%, TMO 1.56%, WAT 1.35%, SPCX 1.17%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MFSG | Weight in NUGO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 13.98% | 15.71% | 1.73% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 11.60% | 10.15% | 1.45% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.42% | 7.05% | 0.63% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.28% | 7.15% | 1.87% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.20% | 5.98% | 2.78% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.81% | 2.09% | 0.72% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.83% | 1.90% | 0.93% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.33% | 3.05% | 1.72% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 0.41% | 3.86% | 3.45% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc. | 1.96% | 2.29% | 0.33% |
75.8% of NUGO is already inside MFSG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MFSG or NUGO?
MFSG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while NUGO charges 0.50%. MFSG is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MFSG or NUGO?
Over the past year MFSG returned +9.18% vs +11.31% for NUGO, so NUGO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MFSG annualized +10.19% vs +11.82% for NUGO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MFSG or NUGO?
NUGO has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 17.5% for MFSG. Worst drawdown: MFSG -23.2% vs NUGO -25.1%.
Should I hold both MFSG and NUGO?
MFSG and NUGO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MFSG and NUGO?
75.8% of NUGO's money is in holdings MFSG also owns. 75.8% of NUGO's is in holdings MFSG also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 67 positions we hold weights for in MFSG and 43 in NUGO.
Which pays a higher dividend, MFSG or NUGO?
MFSG yields 0.06% while NUGO yields 0.00%, so MFSG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NUGO better than MFSG?
MFSG has a lower expense ratio. NUGO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. MFSG is less concentrated, with 53.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.