MFSG vs TCHP
MFS Active Growth ETF vs T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF
Which is better, MFSG or TCHP?
Nearly the same fund. MFSG costs less.
MFSG has a lower expense ratio. MFSG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. MFSG is less concentrated, with 53.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MFSG | TCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 0.57% |
| AUM | $406M | $2.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 69 | 65 |
| YTD Return | +7.53%Best | +2.74% |
| 1Y Return | +9.18%Best | +5.10% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.18% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5%Best | 17.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.2% | -22.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $12,025Best | $11,806 |
| Top 10 Weight | 53.3%Best | 59.3% |
| Fund Family | MFS Investment Management | T.Rowe Price |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 5, 2024 | Aug 4, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 5, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
MFSG vs TCHP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
MFSG vs TCHP Performance
MFS Active Growth ETF (MFSG) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF (TCHP) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price. Over the past year MFSG returned +9.18% while TCHP returned +5.10%. Year to date, MFSG is up 7.53% versus a gain of 2.74% for TCHP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TCHP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 17.5% for MFSG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.2% for MFSG and -22.9% for TCHP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MFSG charges 0.49% per year while TCHP charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $57 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MFSG currently yields 0.06% against 0.00% for TCHP.
Holdings Overlap
67.2% of MFSG's money is in holdings TCHP also owns. 68.2% of TCHP's money is in holdings MFSG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
25 positions in common, counted across the 67 positions we hold weights for in MFSG and 62 in TCHP, against full books of 69 and 65.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 35 positions for TCHP that do not appear in our book for MFSG (29.7% of the fund), and 39 for MFSG that do not appear in TCHP (30.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MFSG | Weight in TCHP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 13.98% | 17.43% | 3.45% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 11.60% | 5.50% | 6.10% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.42% | 4.94% | 1.48% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.28% | 5.92% | 0.64% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.20% | 5.79% | 2.59% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.83% | 3.60% | 0.77% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.81% | 3.53% | 0.72% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 3.36% | 2.69% | 0.67% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.33% | 2.92% | 1.59% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 0.41% | 3.05% | 2.64% |
68.2% of TCHP is already inside MFSG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MFSG or TCHP?
MFSG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while TCHP charges 0.57%. MFSG is the cheaper option, by $8 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MFSG or TCHP?
Over the past year MFSG returned +9.18% vs +5.10% for TCHP, so MFSG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MFSG annualized +10.19% vs +9.13% for TCHP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MFSG or TCHP?
TCHP has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 17.5% for MFSG. Worst drawdown: MFSG -23.2% vs TCHP -22.9%.
Should I hold both MFSG and TCHP?
MFSG and TCHP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MFSG and TCHP?
68.2% of TCHP's money is in holdings MFSG also owns. 68.2% of TCHP's is in holdings MFSG also owns. They hold 25 positions in common, counted across the 67 positions we hold weights for in MFSG and 62 in TCHP.
Which pays a higher dividend, MFSG or TCHP?
MFSG yields 0.06% while TCHP yields 0.00%, so MFSG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TCHP better than MFSG?
MFSG has a lower expense ratio. MFSG led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. MFSG is less concentrated, with 53.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.